What are the most noteworthy aspect of each DSLR system?
- Thread starter dRebelXT
- Start date
- Status
I think Pentax just add a new advantage SR (Shake Reduction) in their future system, similar to AS :sweat:
Antishake?
Konica Minolta, body build in AS (Anti-Shake) as mentioned, nice straight out of the camera colour, cheap good quality lens, good ergonomic body.
Antishake?
Konica Minolta, body build in AS (Anti-Shake) as mentioned, nice straight out of the camera colour, cheap good quality lens, good ergonomic body.
Nikon - body
Canon - full frame sensor
Nikon - wide angle lenses
Canon - tele lenses
Nikon - Flash system
Canon-Auto Focus Speed on Pro bodies
Nikon - Macro system
Canon-Low Noise at High ISOs
Nikon-1.5x on all DSLRs(For tele shooters)
Canon-Very stingy with pricing
Nikon-Always one gen. behind Canon.
Canon - full frame sensor
Nikon - wide angle lenses
Canon - tele lenses
Nikon - Flash system
Canon-Auto Focus Speed on Pro bodies
Nikon - Macro system
Canon-Low Noise at High ISOs
Nikon-1.5x on all DSLRs(For tele shooters)
Canon-Very stingy with pricing
Nikon-Always one gen. behind Canon.
Yes IMHO Panasonic quality (quality control, quality assurance, reliability) is better than the rest.redstone said:
redstone said:
i can sense you are doubting pansonic's quality .... :think:
[darth vader voice]you underestimate the power of the force...[/darth vader voice] :devil:
panasonic cameras are reliable and trustworthy...not yet certain about the new DSLR though...
Fuji:Sensor, Colour, Low Noise, High DR, Good WB
Canon : Sensor, Low Noise, Good WB
KM : Colour, Low Price, Built in AS
Olympus: U/W friendly. New "LIVE" LCD
Nikon : Flash
Sony : Very Branded
Canon : Sensor, Low Noise, Good WB
KM : Colour, Low Price, Built in AS
Olympus: U/W friendly. New "LIVE" LCD
Nikon : Flash
Sony : Very Branded
Doesn't matter as long as the images are nicer than Canon's (IMHO).. Canon sensors/image processing engine removes noise better but it also tend to remove the detail and thus making the pictures look flat. Then again, it might be the optics also, otherwise why would EOS users want to fit Nikon lenses on their EOS bodies?JediForce4ever said:ok..my bad..
Nikon-One gen behind Canon in DSLR sensors.
Konica Minolta-
Wireless flash system (Even the in-camera flash also can fire, not like nikon)
Flim-like colours (natural)
In-built AS (saves money, imagine getting IS or VR for every lens you own)
Very very very good built quality (Even their prosumer Dimage A1 and A2 uses magnisium alloy bodies)
Superior G lens series (Better than Canon's L, and also much more expensive)
Very low depriciation (comparing to Canon's ever changing cameras. and the 7D is still selling 1.5K plus secondhand on the average)
sadly, all this advantages are useless ever since Sony took over.
Wireless flash system (Even the in-camera flash also can fire, not like nikon)
Flim-like colours (natural)
In-built AS (saves money, imagine getting IS or VR for every lens you own)
Very very very good built quality (Even their prosumer Dimage A1 and A2 uses magnisium alloy bodies)
Superior G lens series (Better than Canon's L, and also much more expensive)
Very low depriciation (comparing to Canon's ever changing cameras. and the 7D is still selling 1.5K plus secondhand on the average)
sadly, all this advantages are useless ever since Sony took over.
- Status
Similar threads
