.... we won't be surprised you wake tomorrow with a PRC next to you.:bsmilie:
Actually, the atomic bombs ending the war was a myth. A potential Soviet invasion frightened the Japanese more after the Japanese were completely stomped by the Red Army in Manchuria. Japanese causalties were 10 times that of the Red Army's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria
Between the Communists and Nuclear Bombs, the Japanese feared the former more because it meant the destruction of their culture. Like you know, the Emperor would be executed?Your Wiki link Quote The rapid defeat of Japan's Kwantung Army has been argued to be a significant factor in the Japanese surrender and the end of World War II Unquote.
Success in just one theatre of battle that is arguable suddenly became the sole cause of surrender, a significant factor become sole factor :bsmilie: The defeat may have been a contributory factor in the final surrender but without the devastation brought by the atomic bombs, you think the Japanese would just suddenly & quickly throw in the towel? This especially since the Japanese are such a proud people, who are willing to commit suicide rather than face the shame of surrender? The Japanese were frightened??? :bsmilie::bsmilie: They had no choice, facing the prospect of utter annihilation of their country & people. They & the whole world witnessed the dawn of the atomic age, of bombs which can destroy an entire nation, race (or even mankind). The emperor has to bow down in this instance
But of course, history is debatable & it depends on which side you are on, whether you support or opposed the bombings.. But the bombs are not a myth.
Between the Communists and Nuclear Bombs, the Japanese feared the former more because it meant the destruction of their culture. Like you know, the Emperor would be executed?
Mind you, the Americans have already wrought nuclear explosion level destruction on Japanese cities and the Japanese still hadn't surrendered yet. Like you know, the fire bombings of Tokyo?
The situation in Japan is far more complicated than claiming "oh the bombs ended the war". It was far more complicated than that because even after the bombs the Japanese were holding out for a settlement that would allow them to keep their conquests. The Russian invasion however, put that illusion to the pastures for good. Never mind that the Red Army was establishing a beachhead in the Sakhalin islands.
You don't get the point. If the Americans wanted to have killed the Emperor, they would have done it during the firebombings of Tokyo. Instead, they explicitly told their bomber pilots not to drop their bombs on the Imperial Palace. You know how many people were killed in that firebombing? Something like over a hundred thousand people, which isn't too far off from the casualties wrought by one of the nuclear bombs. No Need for Nukes. The firebombings would have done the job. The Japanese were incapable of intercepting American B-29 bombers and their navy was a shambles. Their armies were weak, and facing a war hardened and well equipped opponent like the Red Army, they were simply a pack of cards waiting to fall. Militarily, they were already defeated even before the nuclear bombings.Read the broadcast on the termination of war (surrender to the Allies) by the Japanese emperor here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyokuon-h%C5%8Ds%C5%8D,in particular the Content. And from Full Text (partial)
Quote
Moreover, the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should We continue to fight, not only would it result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization.
Such being the case, how are We to save the millions of Our subjects, or to atone Ourselves before the hallowed spirits of Our Imperial Ancestors? This is the reason why We have ordered the acceptance of the provisions of the Joint Declaration of the Powers.
Unquote
The atomic bombs were dropped on 6 & 9 August 1945. Japan surrendered (declaration of termination of war) on 15 August 1945 (official documents signed later). Russia declared/commence war on Japan on 8/9 August with the invasion of Manchuria. Attack of Karafuto / Sakhalin started on 11 August, breaking the defence line/resistence only on 16 August & completed the conquest on 26 August. Check out Soviet Invasion & Post War here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karafuto_Prefecture
If the Allies wanted to knock off the Emperor (no messy & contentious execution) & obliterate whatever structures of government, civilisation & culture, all they need is to drop off a couple more of 'Little Boy' & 'Fat Man' over Tokyo. No need for long drawn out battles & loss of soldiers like for the Russians.
Tony Abbott accused of going too far over Japan’s war record
The same can be said of the relationship between Singapore and the PRC ......... We were literally forced to surrender a $30 billion project to those bastar*s and we now still have our garmen licking their ballz big time. Makes me wanna puke everytime I see our garmen sucking up to them. I guess Diplomacy is one term I will never understand.
Actually, how you know they feared the Russians more, other than based on your own conjecture? If they feared the destruction of their culture &/or the emperor's execution, the bomb would also do the same job, if not faster, better & more efficiently. This real fear of the bomb was explicitly expressed in the emperor's declaration, that's why he, on behalf of the people & nation, surrendered. The decision to surrender was already made by the cabinet on 10 August. Military men agree or not, fear because of the loss of power, pride or whatever, wanted to continue fighting to gain leverage or stage a coup by some officers, its a separate matter. And I never said the Americans wanted to kill the Emperor....Between the Communists and Nuclear Bombs, the Japanese feared the former more because it meant the destruction of their culture. Like you know, the Emperor would be executed?
You don't get the point. If the Americans wanted to have killed the Emperor, they would have done it during the firebombings of Tokyo. Instead, they explicitly told their bomber pilots not to drop their bombs on the Imperial Palace. You know how many people were killed in that firebombing? Something like over a hundred thousand people, which isn't too far off from the casualties wrought by one of the nuclear bombs. No Need for Nukes. The firebombings would have done the job. The Japanese were incapable of intercepting American B-29 bombers and their navy was a shambles. Their armies were weak, and facing a war hardened and well equipped opponent like the Red Army, they were simply a pack of cards waiting to fall. Militarily, they were already defeated even before the nuclear bombings.
The Americans by 1944/45 were looking for a way out of the war. They did not want to kill the leadership hierarchy which would have brought an end to the war. The Americans, unlike the Russians, were unwilling to have any more casualties. Dropping the bombs was supposed to convince the Japanese that their cause was hopeless and surrendering was the only option, but even then the Japanese were not willing to. The Japanese were hoping the Soviet Union would mediate a cease-fire that would end the war and allow the Japanese to keep its possessions. After the Soviet invasion, they finally decided there was no more hope of keeping any of their conquests. Even then however, elements within the military were still not willing to surrender, and some of them even launched a failed coup to stop the Emperor from making that surrender announcement.
And honestly? I have no idea what is your point beyond just quoting things out of rote. Simple paragraphs like these aren't going to ever summarize even completely a situation like this. In fact, something like this is worth a History PhD thesis.
Actually, the atomic bombs ending the war was a myth. A potential Soviet invasion frightened the Japanese more after the Japanese were completely stomped by the Red Army in Manchuria. Japanese causalties were 10 times that of the Red Army's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria
I recommend this show but probably it would not be able to survive the intense scrutiny and scholarship of both of you. But I'm a simpleton for history. :embrass:
He is one of my favourite actor But his stance with arms akimbo, stare thru sunglasses, & sticking that thing out of his mouth make him look real scary! The way poster is presented, the hint is that perhaps MacArthur was/behaved like an emperor, rather than the Japanese emperor himself
It is hard to understand how one group of people can be so inhumane in treating another group of people.