Just read today's(15 Aug) Digital Life article, "Frame fatale", about three women professional photographers (or "professional women photographers" as it was written in the article).
It seems that for these highly acclaimed professionals, their equipment of choice for work are the Canon digital bodies, whereas, for pleasure, two of them cited the Nikon workhorse FM2.
I find this rather interesting as it would be logical to assume that they would opt for the same brand of cameras for both work and leisure, since we know both brands have got products that fit all the requirements of work and play. Or do they?
What are your thoughts? :dunno:
Please. I am not trying to start a C vs N flame war thread. If you can't participate in an objective and factual discussion with an amicable attitude please do not post.
It seems that for these highly acclaimed professionals, their equipment of choice for work are the Canon digital bodies, whereas, for pleasure, two of them cited the Nikon workhorse FM2.
I find this rather interesting as it would be logical to assume that they would opt for the same brand of cameras for both work and leisure, since we know both brands have got products that fit all the requirements of work and play. Or do they?
What are your thoughts? :dunno:
Please. I am not trying to start a C vs N flame war thread. If you can't participate in an objective and factual discussion with an amicable attitude please do not post.