Better cameras in the DX format would be D90 or D7000 or D300s. But do bear in mind that higher end bodies comes with increased weight. D3000 is extremely light.. Or u may wanna consider D5100, which I dont recommend as there's not much difference from D3000.
Wow, D5100 inherits the sensor from D7000 but doesn't have much difference from D3000.. Not even when d3000 doesn't have live view, :think: ....
coolthought said:You really sure sports and wild life should be shot using a DX body??
and a DX body not suitable for landscape and portraits??
From what you said.....I must be doing it wrong. I shoot mostly landscape using a D90.
Do u have the photo between FX n DX body? I want to c what is the big differ? I don't think there a huge gap.... Tk
Woh Woh Woh.. Dont flame me on that..
I meant that it isnt that much of a jump from the D3000 to D5100. It'll most probably better if she gotten a D7k or taken the leap to FX rather than to upgrade to D5100 only to find out that she's restricted yet again by the camera.
I've always supported d300s for Dx and d700 for budget constraint Fx lovers.
DM101 said:Anyone knows the replacement for D300 coming out soon or not ?
Marc Chan said:I read there might be a replacement announced this year for d300 s
You are probably right.
Doesn't change the fact that D300s is an extremely capable camera