Swatch said:Please comment on this shot,Need comments!
soma said:like the mood:thumbsup: but if could straighten the whole image would that be better?:think:
The_Cheat said:To keep or not to keep, is entirely up to you. Most often, a picture that doesn't stand out immediately, doesn't necessarily means that it's a bad picture, and ought to be trashed. In most occasions, perception to beauty will change with time (accompanied usually with your own change in maturity, awareness, environment, education etc. etc.). Hence, a picture taken quite sometime ago, may suddenly just appear to you in another light.
Anyway, I'd been pondering on the picture for a very long time. Heck! I'd probably visited this thread for more than 10 times, and yet can't rightly word out my thoughts every single time. On the technical aspects, the shot has interesting tonality and a bright, attention-grabbing subject (the door). Yet, the whole composition makes me wonder what is it that the photographer wanted to really portray. Did the photographer desire to give an alternate take on a mostly uninteresting door or did the photographer desire to show the oldness of the place (and hence the tonality)? Or is it something else that the photographer wanted to do?
Ultimately, I think it's a case where photographer wanted to say too much, and miss on every single aspect. If the door is really the subject, the tones shouldn't be there to fight for the attraction. If the tones is the subject, then the whole look shouldn't be so nicely coloured or "new". If the whole photograph is on another theme, then perhaps the fault ain't even on the processing, but the whole composition.
Yet, the whole composition makes me wonder what is it that the photographer wanted to really portray. Did the photographer desire to give an alternate take on a mostly uninteresting door or did the photographer desire to show the oldness of the place (and hence the tonality)? Or is it something else that the photographer wanted to do?
Ultimately, I think it's a case where photographer wanted to say too much, and miss on every single aspect. If the door is really the subject, the tones shouldn't be there to fight for the attraction. If the tones is the subject, then the whole look shouldn't be so nicely coloured or "new". If the whole photograph is on another theme, then perhaps the fault ain't even on the processing, but the whole composition.
actually, although the door is tilted or some of u guys might say "there's nothing in this pic", i found a lot of interesting things about this pic though. Its definitely a keeper's photo to me.
1) the colour and tones on the wall is very good, and it led to some sort of a melancholy atmosphere.
2) And as for the door, the red really contrasted well with the background and stood out from it. Beneath the tattered walls, you have a smooth looking perfect door, isnt tat a nice contrast?
3) the tilt and slant of the image leads ur eyes to the door and make u wanna explore wats behind the door.
If the photographer wants to bring out a sense of 'compare and contrast,' then a red door against a black and white wall works to the effect, but it is not really unique or captivating enough to be a keeper.
So I'd say probably a caption or title to a photo, to better reflect the photographer's intentions and give the viewers a general direction on how to best perceive the photo.
the door is taking up too much of the frame with the kind of colour contrast. it overwhelms without being subtle and makes the picture totally meaningless.
stand further back, include more walls, fill the picture up with the degraded wall texture and leave the door as a small red piece. leave the viewer with room to imagine about the subject, don't just show the subject
Swatch said:I will ponder on this,must read a few times more to understand:sweat: