Tamron 17-50, 28-75 or 28-105 f2.8?


Status
Not open for further replies.

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#1
Hi All, i have read amny reviews but not decided. Putting price aside which would be sharpest with nice bokeh? Thanks
 

night86mare

Deregistered
Aug 25, 2006
25,541
0
0
www.pbase.com
#2
do you realise that these are pretty DIFFERENT lenses, because of focal length?

if you are looking to buy for hte sake of buying, like you seem to be doing here, my advice is not to buy
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#3
do you realise that these are pretty DIFFERENT lenses, because of focal length?

if you are looking to buy for hte sake of buying, like you seem to be doing here, my advice is not to buy
Ha thanks for ur comments, i wish i have tt type of resources to buy for the sake of buying. I just wanna get one tt can be multipurpose due to my budget constraint so tt i need not get too many lens.


As im not a pro. Basically using it for indoors n weddings n events with low light. I thot a zoom lens with f2.8 would be useful? As long is reasonably sharp n fast AF will be good. Thanks
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#4
before anyone can advise u, can u at least list what equipment you are currently using?? and also, what lenses u have right now??
 

chalib

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2007
2,072
0
0
#5
Agreed with Night86mare.....

17-50 and 28-75 are equally good, depend on what FL you need

Do consider your camera cropping ratio. 28 may not be wide enough
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#6
Agreed with Night86mare.....

17-50 and 28-75 are equally good, depend on what FL you need

Do consider your camera cropping ratio. 28 may not be wide enough
Thanks Chalib, currently using D90. Usually use for my toddler, events, weddings low light. : )
 

Blur Shadow

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2005
4,886
4
0
#8
Both 17-50mm and 28-75mm are worthy of consideration. If unsure, simply borrow/rent to have a feel of the lenses.
 

thengz

New Member
Aug 29, 2007
901
0
0
#10
Since you've already have the Tokina 12-24mm, probably the Tamron 28-75mm would be a better choice. I've owned all these lenses before, and mine you, the Tamron 28-105mm is very heavy and it has a weird filter size, 82mm, I didn't even get the filter for the 28-105mm, sold it away as I found it too heavy.

28-75mm and 17-50mm are comparable, but, like I said, you've already have the 12-24, you'll probably prefer to use that for wide angle shots.
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#11
Since you've already have the Tokina 12-24mm, probably the Tamron 28-75mm would be a better choice. I've owned all these lenses before, and mine you, the Tamron 28-105mm is very heavy and it has a weird filter size, 82mm, I didn't even get the filter for the 28-105mm, sold it away as I found it too heavy.

28-75mm and 17-50mm are comparable, but, like I said, you've already have the 12-24, you'll probably prefer to use that for wide angle shots.
Thanks thengz, cso the tokina 14-24 is f4 n is my bros, tts why caught in the decision is should get 17-50 or 28-75. Many thanks for all advice n suggestions!! : )
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#12
Thanks thengz, cso the tokina 14-24 is f4 n is my bros, tts why caught in the decision is should get 17-50 or 28-75. Many thanks for all advice n suggestions!! : )
hmm.. than with the 14-24, do u always feel that its too wide for u? or is it just nice??
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#13
hmm.. than with the 14-24, do u always feel that its too wide for u? or is it just nice??
i think im fine with that with adjustment of my positions on 14-24f4. Is more of the F value as if in dim light i thot the f2.8 would make a difference in speed. : ) thks
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#14
i think im fine with that with adjustment of my positions on 14-24f4. Is more of the F value as if in dim light i thot the f2.8 would make a difference in speed. : ) thks
hmm.. in that case, i think the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 or the Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.8 would suit u best!!!

I have the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, although its 1 f-stop faster than f/4, its not fast enough in low-light/indoor situations.
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#15
hmm.. in that case, i think the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 or the Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.8 would suit u best!!!

I have the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, although its 1 f-stop faster than f/4, its not fast enough in low-light/indoor situations.
Realyy! cos i heard alot of comment tt 17-50 f2.8 alot of ppl use for wedding n low lights.
 

mikha

Deregistered
Jul 14, 2008
265
0
0
Earth
#16
for me, I have tried 17-50, its good & sharp (again, for me personally)

but in case u already have 14-24, would be better for you to try 24-75, so there's no overlap range.

imo, tokina 11-16 & tamron 17-50 its a great combo :D
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#17
for me, I have tried 17-50, its good & sharp (again, for me personally)

but in case u already have 14-24, would be better for you to try 24-75, so there's no overlap range.

imo, tokina 11-16 & tamron 17-50 its a great combo :D
Thanks thanks Too : )
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#18
Realyy! cos i heard alot of comment tt 17-50 f2.8 alot of ppl use for wedding n low lights.
True, but have to pump up ISO as well if not using flash.

For indoor events like wedding, the photographer almost always uses a flash.

But f/1.8 or f/1.4 would be better without flash..
 

dslrnikon

New Member
Jul 13, 2009
69
0
0
#19
True, but have to pump up ISO as well if not using flash.

For indoor events like wedding, the photographer almost always uses a flash.

But f/1.8 or f/1.4 would be better without flash..
Hi narofx, so if using flash like SB600, the F is not so much of an issue already is it? So if im using f1.8 than shouldn't use flash? thanks
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#20
Hi narofx, so if using flash like SB600, the F is not so much of an issue already is it? So if im using f1.8 than shouldn't use flash? thanks
yeap in the sense that ur shutter wont have to open for too long and hence resulting in handshake which will cause blurred image.

However, for think like bokeh, f number still matters.

However, do note that flash isnt too good for kids/toddlers.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom