Stupid question...


Status
Not open for further replies.

excelglsi

Deregistered
Oct 11, 2005
1,693
0
0
CCK-Yew Tee
#1
Is a 'fiat lighting = a bad photo'?... Sorie as the title said stupid question... rite..:cry:
 

Del_CtrlnoAlt

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2003
16,268
0
0
Outside the Dry Box.
Visit site
#2
Is a 'fiat lighting = a bad photo'?... Sorie as the title said stupid question... rite..:cry:
no... fiat lighting i dunno got diff with merc, bmw or maybe honda or toyota... but most of it not flat lah, abit of contour, unless talking about the vans...

well, not stupid question lah, just i got bo liao answer... lol...

welcome to kopitiam... :bsmilie: (its a SATURDAY!) -_-"
 

Jan 23, 2005
1,095
0
0
Singapore
#3
Is a 'fiat lighting = a bad photo'?... Sorie as the title said stupid question... rite..:cry:
"Fiat lighting" is most probably a typo. It should probably read "flat". I'm not sure if "flat lighting" exists as a technical term; when people complain about "flat" photos they usually mean low-contrast photos or photos with few shadows that show texture or surface shape. This can be both a good or a bad thing, depending on the intention of the photo and the taste of the viewer.
 

#4
no... fiat lighting i dunno got diff with merc, bmw or maybe honda or toyota... but most of it not flat lah, abit of contour, unless talking about the vans...

well, not stupid question lah, just i got bo liao answer... lol...

welcome to kopitiam... :bsmilie: (its a SATURDAY!) -_-"
lol u make me laugh everytime :bsmilie:
 

Firefox

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
716
0
0
Bedok
#5
Fiat lux is simply latin for "Let there be light".. If there's lighting for your pictures, how can that be bad? :bsmilie::bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom