maybe the one who changed the rule was found hunting for a taxi urgently last week ? :bsmilie:
probably he was hit by the heavy rains.. then he realised.. "oh.. that's what they meant..." but still couldn't find a taxi stand within the area and ended up drenched? :bsmilie:
That show how LTA implementing new ruling without doing any survey. :thumbsd:
Now then they wake up their idea. :thumbsd::thumbsd::thumbsd: LTA
That show how LTA implementing new ruling without doing any survey. :thumbsd:
Now then they wake up their idea. :thumbsd::thumbsd::thumbsd: LTA
not surprised. look at the "bum rest" issue the smrt had recently. what can i say, maybe decision makers has been told to be daring in trying new ideas?
Funny with that bum rest. The first time I saw them put it up last year. I was thinking what were they thinking to set the slanting end outwards. Who is going to have a butt that could sit on it without sliding off. I was thinking..just reverse it. That means angle the slant towards the wall that way...your butt slides back against the way soyou sit more confidently...but then I saw they change the entire design!!!.. I hope this cost for making a new one was the contractors and not something those people in management decided to pay to have the old one remove and pay for a new set to be manufacture and installed.
sorry for ot.
1) contractors following the instruction. dont think smrt can / should make them pay as its not their fault.
2) there is always a cost to trying new ideas / things.
3) there is also cost in employing the wrong staff.
with point 2 n 3, now i can see why operation cost keep going up.:dunno:
It's funny sometime how...usually anything ever implemented is ever reversed. But when it happens...it is called "fine tune" ...have anyone seen anywhere in the news or news release that mentioned it was a trial run and might be scrapped if feedback is negative or the plan falls short of practicality? I tried to look for it but can't find any. But it is a good step in the right direction I guess. heheh..
no 'dumb mistake' lah.. it is always an 'honest mistake' :bsmilie::bsmilie:"Fine-tuning"...
Jeez, why can't they admit they made a dumb mistake???
this kind of implementation in a big organisation usually goes through a team of "think tank" or entire dept..eg but yet they still bugger it like that as a collective group...and for something so basic....it says alot of their organisation as a whole. Sad.
If they admit they have made a dumb mistake, would they still command such a high salary? ..... they can command high pay coz they are "fine-tuning" experts....first-world class :think:"Fine-tuning"...
Jeez, why can't they admit they made a dumb mistake???
To me, a dumber mistake is the adding of so many new ERP ...... still long jam ...:dunno: