Strengths of different films


Status
Not open for further replies.

rumraisin

New Member
Jan 18, 2002
308
0
0
Visit site
#1
So far I've only been shooting with "idiotproof" consumer films ie Kodak Gold/ Max cos I'm unfamiliar with the other options out there. Can anyone list down like the different brands/makes of film and their relative strengths?

Thanks!
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#2
Originally posted by rumraisin
So far I've only been shooting with "idiotproof" consumer films ie Kodak Gold/ Max cos I'm unfamiliar with the other options out there. Can anyone list down like the different brands/makes of film and their relative strengths?

Thanks!
Maybe you can start by listing out what you shoot and your preferences.
 

rumraisin

New Member
Jan 18, 2002
308
0
0
Visit site
#3
Hmm. Well I dabble in everything. Mainly street and architectural photography I guess. Occasionally try shooting performances too.

Actually I was thinking more like a list of what films are good for what purposes-- if you're shooting portraits, use XX film, because it gives good skin tones etc, that sort of thing.
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#4
Oh ok. For street and architectural photography, I would recommend Fuji Reala. Very good colour reproduction. You might need to use a tripod at times as this is a relatively slow film at ISO 100. I sometimes rate it at ISO 64 but that's personally preference. If you use slides, Fuji Velvia is my recommendation.

For B&W, I use Illford Delta 100 for its fine grains. I also use faster films like the Delta 3200 at times. When I need the granier effect, I go for Illford HP5+. These are also my recommendations for street and architecture shots.

I don't shoot portraits or performances so can't help you there. Maybe CK have some recommendations for you.

P.S. Throw away whatever Kodak Max/Gold you might have this very minute.
 

Gunjack

New Member
Jul 6, 2002
1,056
0
0
Zimbabwe
Visit site
#5
Originally posted by Kit

P.S. Throw away whatever Kodak Max/Gold you might have this very minute.
Hmm... Is the Kodak Max/Gold really that bad? I still have one roll with me... Haven't tried Kodak films with my camera yet... But I know for my case I am the limitation and not the film, hehehe...
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#6
Originally posted by Gunjack


Hmm... Is the Kodak Max/Gold really that bad? I still have one roll with me... Haven't tried Kodak films with my camera yet... But I know for my case I am the limitation and not the film, hehehe...
Yes, its really that bad. CK was complaining about them and I decided to try 1 roll myself. Totally waste of time, money and effort. Maybe its just me but I hate that orange cast Kodak films give. Their B&W films are good though.
 

rumraisin

New Member
Jan 18, 2002
308
0
0
Visit site
#8
Hmm... then can you recommend any good 200 or 400 films Kit? 100 is kinda limiting and I'm not always using a fast lens.
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#9
Originally posted by rumraisin
Hmm... then can you recommend any good 200 or 400 films Kit? 100 is kinda limiting and I'm not always using a fast lens.
Sorry, I'm not really into that kind of film unless you're talking about B&W like the Illford SFX and the Delta 400. So I won't be able to recmmend any.

Btw, if architectural photography is what you do, then not having fast lenses and fast films in not limiting at all. You need a tripod.
 

Richard

Senior Member
Jan 16, 2002
522
0
16
#10
Okies, this part is based on hearsay:

Fuji Superia X-tra 400 seems to be favoured by many as pretty good.

This part is based on personal experience:

I tend to be partial towards Fuji Press 800 (or pushed one stop to 1600) when shooting events (low light). Have given me consistently good results.
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#11
Actually I've used Fuji Press 800 briefly. Still have 3 rolls in the fridge. It might be good for performances as Richard pointed out but DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT use it for daytime architectural shots. Way too saturated colours.
 

Richard

Senior Member
Jan 16, 2002
522
0
16
#12
Originally posted by Richard
I tend to be partial towards Fuji Press 800 (or pushed one stop to 1600) when shooting events (low light). Have given me consistently good results.
Also, one more thing. I've been strongly recommended to rate Press 800 at 640 as much as possible to give it more punch. However, I've been unable to verify it as most of the events I've shot require 1600... hehehe...
 

#13
Originally posted by Kit
Oh ok. For street and architectural photography, I would recommend Fuji Reala. Very good colour reproduction. You might need to use a tripod at times as this is a relatively slow film at ISO 100. I sometimes rate it at ISO 64 but that's personally preference. If you use slides, Fuji Velvia is my recommendation.

For B&W, I use Illford Delta 100 for its fine grains. I also use faster films like the Delta 3200 at times. When I need the granier effect, I go for Illford HP5+. These are also my recommendations for street and architecture shots.

I don't shoot portraits or performances so can't help you there. Maybe CK have some recommendations for you.

P.S. Throw away whatever Kodak Max/Gold you might have this very minute.
For Portraits/Weddings I use NPH 400. For wedding dinners, performances, I use Press 800, sometimes pushed to 1600. Press 800 is a great ISO 800 film, very fine grain and good colours. :)

Regards
CK
 

rumraisin

New Member
Jan 18, 2002
308
0
0
Visit site
#14
Thanks for the tips. Pretty useful.
I think I'll try Fuji Superia X-tra-- the next time I shoot film that is.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom