Storage: RAW File


Status
Not open for further replies.

Kimlee

New Member
Jan 23, 2005
81
0
0
Lavender
#1
Hi to all,

I will like to shoot in RAW format. But the problem with RAW is that the size is very huge.

I am wondering, do you people always keep your RAW file after converting it to JPG after post processing.

If yes, do you keep it in the harddisk? Any other suitable media to store the RAW file permanently? DVD-R?

Thank you.
 

Caras

New Member
Jan 11, 2005
102
0
0
#3
Yes, keep your RAW files. Never know when you might need them again. Also, storage media isn't that expensive these days.

I recently started shooting more in RAW. Ran out of space on my HDD, so now I use an external hard disk for storing photos. Eventually plan to have everything backed up on DVD (once I get that drive to work properly...)
 

Kimlee

New Member
Jan 23, 2005
81
0
0
Lavender
#5
Thanks. But DVD is still has limited space... 4.7Gb only for single side. One photo session may come out to be around 1.5Gb for RAW, which means only can store around 3 sessions.

That is a lot of DVD for a year! :sweat:

Maybe a high capacity HD is a better choice? :think:
 

AReality

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
4,458
0
0
VisualJournalist.net
#6
The cost now is around $1 per disc for a 4.7GB disc. Maybe less.
If burn 2 copies, work out to around $0.50 per GB, inclusive of fragmentation.

If u can get a HDD cheaper than that, then go ahead. Dun forget U'll need 2 HDD, 1 for backup.
 

ernest_ted

Senior Member
Jul 10, 2003
897
0
0
53
Jurong Lake District - West
Visit site
#7
With advancement in technology, storage will be greatly increase in the future. But for now, it is 4.7GB.

Anyway it makes good house keeping to store the RAW files externally rather than another HDD.

Also keep at least 2 copies, just in case.



Kimlee said:
Thanks. But DVD is still has limited space... 4.7Gb only for single side. One photo session may come out to be around 1.5Gb for RAW, which means only can store around 3 sessions.

That is a lot of DVD for a year! :sweat:

Maybe a high capacity HD is a better choice? :think:
 

catchlights

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 27, 2004
21,903
46
48
Punggol, Singapore
www.foto-u.com
#8
Kimlee said:
Thanks. But DVD is still has limited space... 4.7Gb only for single side. One photo session may come out to be around 1.5Gb for RAW, which means only can store around 3 sessions.

That is a lot of DVD for a year! :sweat:

Maybe a high capacity HD is a better choice? :think:
still cheaper than shooting on trans or negative.
 

yanyewkay

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2004
3,924
0
0
Cons digger.
#9
if you read the same article as I did.. (i forgot from where though..) it was recommended that when you burn the 2 discs. use different manufacturers (not diff brands) sometimes it's the same manufacturer supplying same discs for different brands. Then store them in 2 different physical locations.

It sound kind of overkill for me as a hobbyist or part time freelance.

I just burn into 1 cd and print out for keeps.
 

Mar 25, 2005
251
0
16
#10
yanyewkay said:
if you read the same article as I did.. (i forgot from where though..) it was recommended that when you burn the 2 discs. use different manufacturers (not diff brands) sometimes it's the same manufacturer supplying same discs for different brands. Then store them in 2 different physical locations.

It sound kind of overkill for me as a hobbyist or part time freelance.

I just burn into 1 cd and print out for keeps.
Yah ... I read this somewhere too.
I keep all my RAW files. And burn them to DVDs. I have 2 copies of each backup. I usually use TDK and Mitsubishi DVDs.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom