I think that it is fair that the golfer paid a "standard percentage" amount of winning, which is the caddy is entitled.
I read in the NewPaper, stating that he had USD700 with him during the time. And he claimed that the caddy misunderstood him. This I found is rubbish and double standard. If he really, willing to pay him the money, why he takes so long to settle it? And if he won in Europe or Americas, I believed he won't be pulling this stunt!!
USD100 on average for 7 days work is hard work for a caddy. Believe me, I'm talking from experienced although the experience is a long time ago but all the same. Those outside the game thought that caddy did not play an important role, but caddy know the fairways and green better than any of the golfer. So that why they rely on their caddy. I remember, during my time as a caddy, every Monday all caddy with handicap played golf on Monday. If you are new, you go to driving range or practice putting, before you move on to the fairway. You are being monitored by the club professional and grade you accordingly.
I think, with Singapore trying to position her status as a prestigious golfing venue, our caddy should have an agreement with the golfers even before the first tee-off. Agreed on the payment agreement and bonuses if the golfer won the tournament. I think they should start having the own association, just like in Europe and America, they are professional too.
-FND->