I've been looking at the sigma and canon telephoto lenses and I really want to get one of them!
I want to do nature photography and want a lens that can (ideally), for example, shoot a bird 20m away and insects close up.
So should I get the sigma or the canon? The sigma has the macro function, which obviously is a draw, but the canon has IS so presumably that will help a lot? Is it possible to shoot with the sigma at 300mm in moderate light conditions without using a tripod without exceedingly steady hands? And can the canon take macro shots without using an extender tube?
I think at this point it's a choice between a first-hand sigma and a second-hand canon without warranty. I'm leaning towards the canon at the moment, though, because the IS seems like a huge advantage.
Thank you!
elaphe
I want to do nature photography and want a lens that can (ideally), for example, shoot a bird 20m away and insects close up.
So should I get the sigma or the canon? The sigma has the macro function, which obviously is a draw, but the canon has IS so presumably that will help a lot? Is it possible to shoot with the sigma at 300mm in moderate light conditions without using a tripod without exceedingly steady hands? And can the canon take macro shots without using an extender tube?
I think at this point it's a choice between a first-hand sigma and a second-hand canon without warranty. I'm leaning towards the canon at the moment, though, because the IS seems like a huge advantage.
Thank you!
elaphe