Should I go for E500 or D200?


Status
Not open for further replies.

matthiascr

New Member
Apr 28, 2006
198
0
0
#1
:confused: Pls give me comments...cause i cant make up my mind on either one..
 

jnet6

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2004
8,179
0
36
not here often anymore
#2
D200- 3:2 format... excellent lens system to me.

E500- i don't like 4:3, hard to print 4r, need to recrop. :(
 

unseen

Senior Member
Dec 14, 2004
2,622
0
0
NTU and Wdls
#3
D200 noise control isn't very fantastic, E500 (or just about any other Olympus model) is worse. Get the D200!
 

Oct 14, 2005
290
0
16
East
#4
matthiascr said:
:confused: Pls give me comments...cause i cant make up my mind on either one..
Dpreview have a detailed review of the 2 cameras.

You can get more information from there.

Both are designed for different segment of users.

But i'm curious, why do you think of E500 when your other choice is D200.

Its a totaly different class.

No offence, just my own opinion:)
 

lsisaxon

Senior Member
Nov 29, 2004
11,941
0
0
#9
matthiascr said:
:confused: Pls give me comments...cause i cant make up my mind on either one..
Like many has mentioned, they are of a different class. It's hard for us to guess what you're looking for.
 

smtan24

New Member
Dec 21, 2005
1,496
0
0
44
Tampines
#10
The Nikon D200 Focal Length Multiplier is 1.5 and Olympus E-500 is Focal Length Multiplier 2. If you want to do wide angle Nikon D200 would be better.
 

Artosoft

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2005
3,710
0
0
Tanjong Katong
#11
Price different... It will be apple to orange comparison.

Of course D200 is the winner :thumbsup: .

Regards,
Arto.
 

theRBK

Senior Member
May 16, 2005
2,048
1
0
#12
D200:
- better resolution
- wide range of custom options (might be intimidating for beginner users)
- fast, very responsive
- wide range of accessories and lenses

E500:
- light weight and compact (a matter of preference, if you prefer light cameras)
- much cheaper (less than 1/2 the price...)
- easier for beginners to use
- cheap and good starter lens packages with body
 

espn

Deregistered
Dec 20, 2002
21,905
0
0
Planet Nikon
#13
theRBK said:
D200:
- better resolution
- wide range of custom options (might be intimidating for beginner users)
- fast, very responsive
- wide range of accessories and lenses

E500:
- light weight and compact (a matter of preference, if you prefer light cameras)
- much cheaper (less than 1/2 the price...)
- easier for beginners to use
- cheap and good starter lens packages with body
Often... it's the entire system, not the camera body.

Once you start a SLR path, it's not easy (read: worth the effort) to change esp from camp to camp.

It's like studying & choosing your career, you cannot say do banking for now because it pays good, then move on to IT because it's your love. It doesn't work that way.

Nikon's entire system wins over the Olympus anytime. Focal range - Fisheye (from 6mm), wide zoom (12-24, 17-55), telephoto (up to 1700mm), flash (i-TTL, CLS), specialisation in optics for commercial, personal usage(s).

Answer's obvious.
 

wind30

Deregistered
Mar 14, 2004
2,927
0
0
#14
since so many people give all the advantages for nikon,

let me chip in with the advantages of olympus. From your other posts you don't seem to be a professional, ie you are not looking at a loens setup worth many THOUSANDS of dollars.

1) olympus has a 14-54mm, 50-200mm f2.8-f3.5. Two lens give you coverage from 28-400mm (35mm eq). f2.8 for quite a wide range. Very light too and weather-sealed. I think total weight of both lens is less than that of the nikon 80-200mm f2.8. The 50-200mm is $1400 overseas. The 14-54 is cheap if you can get it as a kit lens. For nikon, if you want the 17-55mm f2.8 it will COST you $2k. The 80-200mm is around $1.5k if I am not wrong.

Even the cheaper range 14-45, 45-150 lens are very good.

The bad thing about olympus lens lineup is that you cannot find a cheap 18mm zoom (35mm eq) lens... where for nikon you can get the sigma 10-20mm, tokina 12-24mm. Olympus has a 22-44mm zoom lens. So if 22mm is wide enough for you, olympus lens lineup is actually quite good and cheap (overseas)

2) dust buster. Some people loved it, some are indifferent to it. It is very useful if you don't know how to clean your sensor.

BTW, why are you not considering the E330? from the latest reviews + opinons, E330 seems to have better ISO performance, + live view.
 

zcwnfx

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
540
0
0
Potong Pasir
#15
go try out in the shops? see which one is better? or better get from frens? i would prefer D200. 1 point is that my frens are mostly in the nikon system. so we can share lens.
 

JL1500k

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
301
0
0
#16
matthiascr said:
:confused: Pls give me comments...cause i cant make up my mind on either one..
How about 30D - Full frame view
 

Andy Ho

New Member
Jan 10, 2003
389
0
0
Punggol
#20
To all you Nikonians here, including myself, please have some respect for Oly systems. I was never interested in Olympus since day one when I picked up photography. To me, it is either Canon or Nikon. That is until I met a friend of mine recently. He too is a Nikon seow with a full range of Nikon MF lenses and cameras, but lately he set them all aside and bought Olympus. From what he claims, Olympus offers better lenses (as in edge to edge sharpness and no color fringing), a nice 4:3 format which is about standard for most editorial and commercial shoots since Mamiya 6X7, lighter weight and so on...

I wasn't convinced. But out of curiosity, I did a research myself on Olympus system. And the more I did that, the more I love it! Would I buy the camera if I am investing in one? Absolutely! But since I am already using Nikon systems, I will let it go.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom