That is because your statement is made in an absolute manner which is not in fact, picked out of context. I am commenting only on the last statement, not on the rest of the paragraph. If the last statement is removed, I will take no issue at the rest of your post.
I did not expect you to be picking out of context.
A wife being beaten up have the rights to apply for personal protection and hurl the abuser to court.
What i was getting about is,many a time,the position of law are being abused and in this case,quarelsome people[forget them carrying the title photographers]
A photographer trying to deny his wrongs and put his rights on the pedestal,aruging and throwing his so called 'rights' when clearly he's in the wrong?
Now tell me,what do you think is wrong here?
Food for thought