SD9 preview


Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi

wat i DON'T like about it is not the fact that it only takes Sigma lenses.

i think the 1.7x multiplier is a bit too much. that, and the lack of a really high ISO option....
 

Originally posted by Red Dawn
Hi

wat i DON'T like about it is not the fact that it only takes Sigma lenses.

i think the 1.7x multiplier is a bit too much. that, and the lack of a really high ISO option....

but sigma lenses are geared along that focal length anyway? ;p all those super super wides and ok teles...

high ISO? hmm kodak 14cn also right? maybe it's colour vs ISO..

check this out
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/sd9/samples/IMG00073.jpg
 

heh removed... meant to be viewed 100% mah... cos it's way sharp...
shot with a 50mm macro f2.8 lens I think. vivitar. LOL
 

Originally posted by denizenx
heh removed... meant to be viewed 100% mah... cos it's way sharp...
shot with a 50mm macro f2.8 lens I think. vivitar. LOL

Ya man.. i like wat i see.. very sharp
 

Can someone explain to me what's the problem with taking on Sigma mount? I mean if someone is getting a new SLR he'll need to buy new lenses anyway right? So does the mount really matter?
 

Originally posted by darkness
.... So does the mount really matter?

It does, if the existing user who wants to upgrade has a pool of Canon / Nikon lenses. It will make the user think twice on that. ;)
 

Originally posted by darkness
Can someone explain to me what's the problem with taking on Sigma mount? I mean if someone is getting a new SLR he'll need to buy new lenses anyway right? So does the mount really matter?

precisely as goondu says unless sigma does a 1:1 lens exchange to sigma mount LOL...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.