I think the old one is better! At least I see a camera I know for sure its a photography forum... but now... I dun know until I see the words. Just my two cents.
Originally posted by ninelives
macdonald also does not tell it is fast food rest.
u2 also does not tell us it sell clothes, some might tot it is a band.
Seagull does not tell us it is a MF camera.
your nick also does not tell us you are a guy or gal.
the point is, it 's just a name, a trademark. One will know wat clubSNAP is when we became popular.
Originally posted by camerakit
No offence. If that's the way you put it then why bother with the change of logo? :dunno:
Originally posted by ninelives
that one is not an "official" logo, we put that for the sake of it.
none taken. comments always welcome...Originally posted by Zoomer
IMO, it reminds me of the CC logo. Bleh. ;p
No offense to the logo designer. :embrass:
yeah, well that's me... i like clean designs, and doing what i do, hard not to be corporate. you should have seen some of the weirder ones i did up though... :bsmilie:Originally posted by Dagger
Looks like you were thinking of some global stuff when designing? I mean the red-green and blue curves. Guess this is all perception. The old camera one was also ok. This is has a whitish, cleaner, simple coloured look. Just my 2 cents worth.
Originally posted by Larry
yeah, well that's me... i like clean designs, and doing what i do, hard not to be corporate. you should have seen some of the weirder ones i did up though... :bsmilie:
Originally posted by Linkster
but it bears an uncanny resemblance for the DSTA logo..
check it out here!
:gbounce: