I shoot both. Raw + Jpeg(Hi-Res).
As i normally edit my shots through jpeg and if i mess up i have my raw as back up. Lol.
It's not right though as you are suppose to edit the raw file than convert to jpeg. Haha.
edutilos- said:Yes, you can do a lot more with the RAW format - I think it depends on the degree of control you want over your image.
For less serious shots, I don't do anything with the RAW file; for landscapes, you can really pull a lot more DR out of a RAW file compared to the JPG.
NewbieInCS said:Raw. It has a lot of flexibility in pp on dpp.
Used to do raw+jpg, but don't see the point in doing so anymore. I can batch process the whole bunch of raw on computer using the shot settings, which will give me the same jpg as the camera, should I need so.