Hi All
Would like to seek advises. Not sure if it is a silly question but am trying to look for a work around. I am inexperience in this area.
Condition: I am shooting 'moving' objects in open space.
Q1. Am I going to use GND (with stops) if the sky is much brighter than the objects?
Q2. Is it advisable to stack 2 ND4 (possible?) and not getting 1 ND110? I may not know the lighting condition then.
Thanks
You can try to simulate cutting down light by closing the aperture, though going from f3.5 to f22 will only cut down light by about 5 stops. Okay, did I just saw only? :bsmilie:
You can also overexpose your pic and still be able to see what effects there are even. Get creative, and think of ways you can cut down light/prolong exposure.
By ND4 do you mean 2 stop ND or 4 stop ND? I am assuming ND4 from Hoya which means 2 stops. Add another 2 stop ND and you get 4 stops only. ND110 is a 10 stop ND. I can approx simulate it by adding a 3 stop ND (ND8) and 6 stop ND (ND64) - because I have these also.
Stacking is very personal. Some here would prefer to stop down to f22 rather than stack. I prefer to stack and live with vignetting or do something creative with it, or just use a smaller angle or view. You can also simulate how it will look like if you stack by adding whatever filter you have at the moment, e.g. clear protector+UV+CPL and see how badly it will vignette. For all you know, it may not vignette at all because you may not be using an ultra wide angle where stacking becomes an issue.
Last edited: