Written by Sunita Sue Leng Monday, 22 December 2008 10:13
Why Taipei trumps Singapore
For Singaporeans who think theirs is the best in Asia outside Japan, think again, article in The Edge Singapore.
Dec 30, 2008
......
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, the best part about Taipeis MRT is its frequency. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]According to Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC), the company that runs the system, trains arrive at two to four-minute intervals at peak hours. Off-peak, it is four to seven minutes.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]In reality, it is much more frequent. I know because Ive timed it. At peak hours, trains come as often as every minute. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]As for off-peak hours? Well, Ive never had to wait more than three or four minutes. As a result, even during the morning rush hour, the trains are never as packed as they are in Singapore.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]TRTC has won praise not just locally but internationally. It has been ranked No 1 for reliability for four straight years (2004 to 2007), according to the Nova/CoMET International Railway Benchmarking Group (of which Singapores SMRT Corp is also part).[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]All this got me wondering just how TRTC is able to deliver such a world-class MRT service. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Perhaps, it doesnt have to transport as many people as in the crowded Lion City? Perhaps, its government-owned and isnt under pressure to make as much money as possible and can run more trains?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]So, I pulled up some numbers (see table below). And the broad conclusion is that Taipei proves it is possible to offer a high-quality, high-frequency and affordable MRT service without losing money. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Tracking the MRTs[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Singapore population: 4.6m[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Length of MRT: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]109.4km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]No. of MRT stations: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]66[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]No of MRT lines:[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] five[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average daily ridership: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]1.56m[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average ticket price: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]S$1.00[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average trip distance: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]11.2km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Total passenger-trip distance[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](passengers times km traveled) annually: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]5,714.5km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average daily train runs[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]: Just over 1,000[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Taipei population: 5.5m[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Length of MRT: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]74.7km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]No. of MRT stations: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]69[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]No of MRT lines: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]eight[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average daily ridership:[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] 1.14m[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average ticket price: NT21.9 [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](S$1.00)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average trip distance: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]7.9km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Total passenger-trip distance[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](passengers times km traveled) annually: [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]3,298.9km[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average daily train runs[/FONT]: 2,171
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It also suggests that certain services, such as public transport, tend to function optimally as natural monopolies and ought not to be owned by companies that seek to maximise profits.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Lets look first at the one common element between the two: the cost of taking a train. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Average ticket prices in Singapore and Taipei are about $1. This is pretty low by international[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]standards, as anyone who has had the misfortune to take the London Underground knows.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Singapore and Taipei are also pretty dense cities, but the latter packs more folks (5.5m of them) into a smaller area (272 sq km). In comparison, Singapore is home to 4.6m residents spread over some 692 sq km.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]As such, in terms of coverage, Singapores network of five MRT lines is more extensive, totalling 109.4km, versus TRTCs 74.4km network. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, TRTC has more stations on its smaller network, which means less distance between stations and greater convenience for commuters.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]More trains in Taipei[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Just how many people take the MRT each day? In 2007, Singapores MRT moved an average of 1.56 million people a day. Thats just over a third more than what TRTC transported last year. [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]So yes, TRTCs network is smaller and it moves fewer people, which is one reason it feels les crowded.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, what is illuminating is the difference in frequency. Last year, TRTC made an average of 2,171 train runs a day. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]SMRT clocked in at just over 1,000 a day for its fiscal year ended March 2008. This is not strictly an apples-with-apples comparison. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]SMRTs system is older, has heavier loads and travels further than TRTCs factors which play role in how often trains can be run. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The comparison also doesnt include data from SBS Transit, which runs the North- East Line. But, as SMRT accounts for more than four fifths of total MRT ridership, it is fairly representative of the whole picture.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif].......[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]SMRT more profitable[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Still, its safe to assume that its bumped-up frequency continues to lag TRTCs. And this, to an extent, is reflected in SMRTs bottom-line, which is much heftier than TRTCs. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]In FY2008, SMRTs rail operations saw revenue of $436.9m. Earnings before interest and tax was $129.3m. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]In comparison, TRTC saw approximately $415 million in fare revenue in 2007 and just $41.3m in pre-tax profit.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]TRTC is 73.75% owned by the Taipei City Government. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications owns a further 17.14% while the Taipei County Government owns 8.75%. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Clearly, public-listed SMRTs returns on its rail operations are far better for its shareholders than TRTCs. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, TRTC which has been profitable every year except its first two is better for its[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]commuters, who have been inspired to pen a poem or two in praise of their well-regarded metro.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif](Sunita Sue Leng, previously an associate editor at The Edge Singapore, is now based in Taipei and writes on Greater China issues).[/FONT]