PSI 145 (10pm)
- Thread starter raincool2005
- Start date
- Status
gosh...
the temple is not even 500m from my house... :embrass:
u need critic? :think:
no... was just a snap shot with 50/f1.8 @ f1.8 and ISO 1600 =x :embrass:
as u can see... CA was bad
ya agreed..thats the problem with the 50mm f1.8 lens...everyone keep saying its sharp, its good value for money etc... but they dunno that the lens got bad CA.. last time i got 1 copy, and my CA is as bad as yours & i sold it promptly after I realised this weakness of the lens
those ppl tat keep advertising this lens ought to be shot in their heads..
Canon & Nikon 1 suxs? hmm Minolta 1 no problem, probably cos its f1.7... haha...
btw think focusing also problem, need to check composition & alignment of horizon... :bsmilie:
No, its a great lens, Ive used it for over a year, the CA has never really been obvious or an issue to me. This is a fantastically sharp lens for the price, just respect its limitations. Anyway, I wouldnt have shot a nightscape like that with a 50mm unless I really had to.
Just because you dont like it doesnt mean we should all be shot. We are right.
nope the nikon one sux.. but the canon and minolta one i have no idea, never used before
If these kind of pics are acceptable, i have nothing to say.
there is not just one branch which is like dat, when all the branches in the pic are CAing, i really wonder y ppl buy it
If these kind of pics are acceptable, i have nothing to say.
there is not just one branch which is like dat, when all the branches in the pic are CAing, i really wonder y ppl buy it
What are you taking a photo of?
Im sorry, this lens does not 'sux'. I suggest you learn how to use the lens properly.
If these kind of pictures are acceptable, then its a great lens!
The lens may have some CA problems, but clearly, it NOT the end of the world. Like Ive said its a fantastic lens, and is very sharp when used properly.
- Status
