pictures appears soft


Status
Not open for further replies.
Post a picture to see if whats the problem.No pic very hard to tell.
 

yes pic tells a thousand words
 

upload the pic on some pic uploading site like imageshack.us or clubsnap gallary
click on insert image button just ontop of the reply text box
 

Hi would like to borrow the thread to ask some questions. Normally for night shots do you all use natural, normal or vivid? How about day time?

Thanks in advance for any enlightenment;)
 

Hi borrow this thread again;p This picture I used vivid; for daytime it's ok to use vivid right?

P1030013_filtered2.jpg
 

theres no problem with using any mode, it depends on the person behind the camera. I go with normal all the way, a little too lazy to change and if theres i need i will do pp

and what are you trying to show on this pic?
 

i dont think you should use the modes.

unless you dunno how to post process....

its always better to use PS than to allow your cam to process it
 

bernstein1234 said:
Hi borrow this thread again;p This picture I used vivid; for daytime it's ok to use vivid right?

P1030013_filtered2.jpg

it all depends on urself. I use vivid to shoot fireworks & ppl.
Shoot the same shot using different setting, then compare the pics.
tats how u leran & understand ur camera performance better.
 

jlpk007 said:
how to post a pic here?

did minor adjustment to ur pic below...............compare with ur original

1. Ur original Pic
original1.jpg


2. did minor contast adjustment
Loo_Puay_Kiong.jpg


3. did minor contast adjustment
Loo_Puay_Kiong1.jpg


note: both pic using different editing software
 

My try - manipulate curve and saturation:

curve_and_saturation.jpg
 

jpeg after editing turns out really bad man....can see the photo is edited.....
 

original12bg.jpg


heres mine, not much different and not a very good one compare to others
 

jlpk007 said:
jpeg after editing turns out really bad man....can see the photo is edited.....

the camera already does processing of images even in TIFF or Jpeg... best is still to post process it after shooting, can't get miracle photographs out of just the camera alone.. :sweat:
 

FZ5owner said:
it all depends on urself. I use vivid to shoot fireworks & ppl.
Shoot the same shot using different setting, then compare the pics.
tats how u leran & understand ur camera performance better.

Totally agree, depending also what you want to capture and tell: FZ5 Still Live Vivid Mode.
Photos were not post-processed, just resized for web. (Not mine though, how I wished) :cool:
 

here you go.. my try-
from
original1.jpg

to
original1.jpg

Things I've done in the 1min job
1) raise the curve
2) reduce shadows using a script that I have
3) raise saturation level of the yellow and cyan component
4) v slight sharpening via lab colour sharpening (I kinda regret because now that I look back, the image is sharp enough, no need to do this)
5) create a curve layer, mask only the statue using a brush to paint in mask area.
6) save
 

I tested vivid mode last time, and I stoppped using it. The red colour tends to be blown, not to my liking. Upping saturation in PS is alot easier..
 

jlpk007 said:
jpeg after editing turns out really bad man....can see the photo is edited.....
It's a matter of rubbish in rubbish out. The original jpeg provided was of uber low quality, I don't think you can expect us to give you something good right?
I always edit and save at quality 11 (similar to 92% of other app's jpeg quality) and for web purposes, I never go below 9 level because after that I find the images looking quite horrible.
The image given original1.jpg was only saved at level 8... -.-"
 

Status
Not open for further replies.