Olympus to sell off camera division


tommyk

Senior Member
Jun 10, 2013
1,278
11
38
36
Singapore
The OLYMPUS m4/3 system is causing Great losses and with little future left due to disappointing sales in their EM1x and pro lens like 300mm f4 etc.. Due to consumers abandoning Olympus, and continued losses, who could be a likely buyer?

1. Temasek, because they have a track record of buying into companies who are famous but past their primes, eg stanchart, ubs etc

2. Huawei, because they want a larger consumer based and can use olympus technology to improve on their own. If only The japanese are okay with selling to The chinese easily.

3. Private Equity players

4. Peter Lim

Any comments?
 

ricohflex

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2005
3,416
21
38
sing
Olympus is still famous for medical scoping via a tube inserted into human body.
Olympus does not depend on its camera division.
When Maitani introduced the OM1 SLR film camera in 1972 it was a sensation.
(I still keep the beautiful OM1-MD body)
Along the way film died and digital took over.
Olympus tried 4/3 Digital SLR but was not successful.
Then Olympus, Panasonic formed MFT in 2008. Had some initial success with MFT.
Over time technology improved and prices dropped. (just check how much you paid for memory cards in the past compared to now)
Sony introduced its A7 in 2013. It began to carve out a large slice of the market.
Canon and Nikon were afraid to go into autofocus full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera .
Afraid that it would cannibalise their digital SLRs.
But the rise and rise of Sony finally frightened Canon and Nikon so much, that they overcame their management paralysis.
Canon and Nikon went all out into autofocus full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera in 2019.
They had allowed Sony free rein for 6 years to monopolise this segment. It was a tactical mistake.
Bill Gates publicly admitted his biggest regret was missing the boat on mobile phones and letting Apple dominate.
By the time Microsoft tried to sell the Windows mobile phone, it was too little too late. Windows phone failed miserably.
By 2019 the writing was on the wall for MFT, as larger sensor sizes dropped in price.
Panasonic began to leave the MFT sinking ship in 2018 and by 2019 had 2 full frame mirrorless interchangeable lens bodies to sell.
MFT will not die overnight. Because there are many who have invested heavily into the system.
They insist MFT is wonderful. Better not argue with them. They have a right to their opinion.
No one will buy Olympus MFT camera division. Except for the 5 axis body IS technology, it has no other value.
Like Sony Walkman portable tape recorders, MFT will die a slow death over a few years and eventually disappear from the market.
Overtaken by the progress of technology, i.e. the ability now to sell full frame sensor digital cameras to consumers at reasonable prices.
Pricing is everything.
What is the use of state of the art world beating technology if a camera costs USD$100,000?
The ordinary consumer will not be able to buy.
Now in 2019 full frame sensor cameras have fallen in price within the locus of the ordinary consumer.
Thus after a while, say for example by the year 2025 especially for new buyers; they will not consider APS-C or MFT.
Because for the same price or less, they can have full frame.
The analogy is: Why buy a Perodua Kancil when for the same price or less, you can have a Mercedes-Benz?

Afternote:
Compare Sony A7 R IV to Olympus E-M1X. Oh, dear..... it is not looking good for Olympus.
Compare the price, size, weight, image megapixel 61MP to 20MP, sensor size, eyeAF (if any on Oly), pixel shift image size 240MP vs 50MP, resolution of EVF, AF in Video mode, dual band wifi, bluetooth NFC, ability to accept digital audio input, etc...
 

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ah Keong

tommyk

Senior Member
Jun 10, 2013
1,278
11
38
36
Singapore
The writing is on the wall in line with what you have written.
In 3-5 years time, FF mirrorless will be like $1.1.5k and gets mainstream even for most 1st time camera buyers.
Where will m4/3 be and how much can it be sold, sandwiched between the ever presence phone cameras and FF?

The question is how many new "pro-like" camera bodies will be released by Olympus before 2025?
 

leeweelee80

Senior Member
Sep 9, 2006
587
0
16
Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
The writing is on the wall in line with what you have written.
In 3-5 years time, FF mirrorless will be like $1.1.5k and gets mainstream even for most 1st time camera buyers.
Where will m4/3 be and how much can it be sold, sandwiched between the ever presence phone cameras and FF?

The question is how many new "pro-like" camera bodies will be released by Olympus before 2025?
unless full frame go very small, if not i believe m4/3 will still be here. I have thought of selling off my stuffs to go full frame. But weight is still a major consideration. Bright lens are also considerably cheap on the m4/3 compare to the full frame and it compensate for the ISO.
 

felixcat8888

Senior Member
May 8, 2005
9,718
32
48
53
Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
There are people who use FF cameras, BUT don't carry it overseas for a family holiday. Here, some will use a lighter weighted camera, like the m/43 system. There are enough lenses to suit different types of photographers and it is not to say that Olympus does not have many choices of lenses. What they have currently will suit the different types of users.
 

leeweelee80

Senior Member
Sep 9, 2006
587
0
16
Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
There are people who use FF cameras, BUT don't carry it overseas for a family holiday. Here, some will use a lighter weighted camera, like the m/43 system. There are enough lenses to suit different types of photographers and it is not to say that Olympus does not have many choices of lenses. What they have currently will suit the different types of users.
Yeah, like me, i only use it for holiday. i am not a professional anyway...
 

Blu-By-U

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2006
1,658
8
38
Selangor D.E.
Those who think the system is dead, please sell out. Why bother shouting it out here? The MFT system is too small, light and too little MP for your use anyway. BTW, how many prints do you do out of every full memory chip you fill up? And if you do print, how big do you really print? AO?
 

  • Like
Reactions: skf

Pitachu

New Member
Sep 18, 2019
22
3
3
53
Generally, MFTs fits into a niche for users who still prefer a proper camera with a few lenses light enough to carry around most trips instead of just using a compact camera or mobile phone.

I have a MFT with a few lenses and bring it around for most trips. I have a Canon 5D with L-lenses too, but use it for work only. It is really a pain to bring ta Dslr system for a holiday.

Anyway, most camera makers except for Sony are in trouble. IF MFT dies, it is not because the system is not good, but overall, the whole camera market is shrinking as more and more ppl just shoot with the mobile phone, as their main purpose is to share on social media.
 

gbn2377

Member
May 28, 2010
200
0
16
Those who think the system is dead, please sell out. Why bother shouting it out here? The MFT system is too small, light and too little MP for your use anyway. BTW, how many prints do you do out of every full memory chip you fill up? And if you do print, how big do you really print? AO?
I came to MFT from bigger bodies for its convenience and image quality ..What I lost is "bokeh"..Forget about those megapixels and dynamic range.I am still not convinced...I am happy and not intended go back to bigger bodies...Even though some brands bodies are smaller but their lens are still big...What's the point in having a small body except for marketing.....