Olmpus E-300 or Canon 350D?


Status
Not open for further replies.

cnyee74

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
25
0
0
44
#1
Hi, plan to upgrade to DSLR but dunno which one to choose need advice. :confused: :confused: :confused:
 

obewan

New Member
Feb 11, 2005
1,877
0
0
obe.homedns.org
#2
cnyee74 said:
Hi, plan to upgrade to DSLR but dunno which one to choose need advice.
Hi Cnyee74,

Here is just my personal opinion of these 2 DSLR. Both are very good DSLR.
The Olympus E-300 is selling at a slightly cheaper price than the Canon 350D.
My advice is go for the Canon 350D if you can pay a little more money.
Do consider the Nikon D50 or D70s too. There are many dark side photogs here. :bsmilie:

I had a friend who got an Olympus E-300, and he regretted. Not because that this is a poor camera. But the Zuiko lens don't come cheap. The choices of lens are also more limited compare to Canon. It is also more difficult for him to source for 2nd hand lens. You can take a look at the B&S forum yourself.

For DSLR, you can't go wrong with a Nikon and Canon. Other brands users please don't :flame: me. Haha :sweat:
 

blow

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
26
0
0
46
Serangoon
#3
E300 - ideal for travelling - go for the package deal with tele len. Good len & camera. Macro, Portrait, landscape.

350D - Don't bother. Go for 20D instead. Bundled len is suck. More like a toy camera. I don't expect u to mount it with a L len.

Eventually, you must know your interest. Try the cameras & decide.
 

wind30

Deregistered
Mar 14, 2004
2,927
0
0
#4
agreed if you intend to get 2nd hand lens, ONLY buy Canon and Nikon.

If you don't trade lens, then olympus or the upcoming minolta 5D (if you can wait) is valid alternatives.
 

nemesis32

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2003
3,717
1
0
43
Singapore
Visit site
#5
Whether u buy E300, 350d or D70s etc, prices and specs wise is quite similar.

Impt is what system are u using now? I assume you using a SLR now... so if you have canon lenses, buy 350d, if nikon, buy D70s.

For oly... i think if you dun have any lenses or use any nikon/canon system, it's worth buying. Why? simply because the lenses are good and very light. As a amateur photogs, it will be helpful as higher chance of you shooting if it's not too heavy to lug around.
 

Wai

Senior Member
Jan 17, 2002
5,270
0
36
39
South Pole with Penguin
singastro.org
#6
blow said:
350D - Don't bother. Go for 20D instead. Bundled len is suck. More like a toy camera. I don't expect u to mount it with a L len.
well, if you dont like the bundled lens, can still sell away since they dont worth much anyway. i wont judge the camera based on bundled lens if i were you. the beauty of SLR is the interchangable lens, so if you dont like the bundled lens, u can easily get a better one. however if you buy the wrong camera body, you will be stucked there because it is more expensive to change the body.

when you add the battery grip to the 350D, actually D70 feel more like toys ;p
 

A-Von

New Member
Jul 12, 2005
188
0
0
#8
blow said:
E300 - ideal for travelling - go for the package deal with tele len. Good len & camera. Macro, Portrait, landscape.

350D - Don't bother. Go for 20D instead. Bundled len is suck. More like a toy camera. I don't expect u to mount it with a L len.

Eventually, you must know your interest. Try the cameras & decide.

judging from wat u said u must either be a E300 user or 350d failed upon u before.. :bsmilie:
 

sidder

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
228
0
0
33
Northern GRCs
www.flickr.com
#9
blow said:
E300 - ideal for travelling - go for the package deal with tele len. Good len & camera. Macro, Portrait, landscape.

350D - Don't bother. Go for 20D instead. Bundled len is suck. More like a toy camera. I don't expect u to mount it with a L len.

Eventually, you must know your interest. Try the cameras & decide.
I beg to differ that the 350D package is pointless. Its an entry DSLR and u cannot compare it to a 10D or 20D. the most u can compare is the similarities of the functions both bodies offer. eg, 350D has digic 2, ETTL II.
in any case, i think get a DSLR body that suits your needs or suit your style of photography.

Back to your topic, i think the oly offers quite a wholesome package with the zoom lens and its lens kit. True enough the lens selection is very limited. but hey if it caters to your style, why not. 350D again like others have mentioned offer lens from the low end to the high end. 4/3 is another issue altogether which also hsould be considered.

I was also like u was banging my buck on 350D or E-300, but since i like night photog and street photog, i needed a range of lenses both WA and Tele to feed my photog needs. Thus i chose the 350D. although the start up cost is 200-300 dollars more.

in the end is show your style and pictures not your equipment.
 

JimmyH

New Member
Jun 27, 2005
168
0
0
Hougang, s'pore
#10
The kit lens that comes with canon 300/350D is actually quite useful. Maybe mine is a particularly good one but I got some very good photos from it. The reason why it gets a bad rep from people is because of the plastic look and weight. But this lens delivers pretty good resolution. The 18mm wide angle and the size/weight are another plus for me.
 

sidder

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
228
0
0
33
Northern GRCs
www.flickr.com
#11
i agree 350D has shortcomings. and might be a failure to some users. but to me i feel that 350D is my dream camera.
Wide range of canon lense+3rd party types
Digic 2 for cleaner images and faster continuous shooting.
ETTL II making 580EX a very potent flash unit on my camera.
battery grip bought for a discounted price.
free gifts by canon
good service at Canon Harbour Front and DMH.

It has REALLY brought me deeper into the world of photography and best of all the huge number of Canongraphers in CS whom i can ask questions.
 

Dec 8, 2004
483
0
0
Taipei
#13
obewan said:
Hi Cnyee74,

For DSLR, you can't go wrong with a Nikon and Canon. Other brands users please don't :flame: me. Haha :sweat:
No flames here. :sweat: I completely agree with this. Both offer great DSLR's. Budget wise, 2nd hand gear is close to this:

300D under $1K
D70 ~1.2K
10D ~1.4K
350D ~1.6K
20D ~2.4K

Of course there is some variance in the prices depending on the accessories, but that's roughly what I've seen on the CS forums.

Good luck. :thumbsup:
 

Dec 4, 2004
747
0
0
Medieval Period...
#14
singapurasteve said:
No flames here. :sweat: I completely agree with this. Both offer great DSLR's. Budget wise, 2nd hand gear is close to this:

300D under $1K
D70 ~1.2K
10D ~1.4K
350D ~1.6K
20D ~2.4K

Of course there is some variance in the prices depending on the accessories, but that's roughly what I've seen on the CS forums.

Good luck. :thumbsup:
Hi cnyee74,

Do U know why Oly User dun sell U their E-300 on Ur WTB thread? ;)
 

n0d3

New Member
Feb 3, 2003
1,511
0
0
#15
blow said:
E300 - ideal for travelling - go for the package deal with tele len. Good len & camera. Macro, Portrait, landscape.

350D - Don't bother. Go for 20D instead. Bundled len is suck. More like a toy camera. I don't expect u to mount it with a L len.

Eventually, you must know your interest. Try the cameras & decide.
The kit lens is a great lens and not as "sucky" as some people claim it to be. Its pretty sharp at f/8 and I've seen many great photos taken with the kit lens. And you can't just judge the camera from the lens it was bundled with. The beauty of SLRs, like Wai said is the ability to interchange lenses.
 

Jun 7, 2005
18
0
0
Singapore
#16
n0d3 said:
The kit lens is a great lens and not as "sucky" as some people claim it to be. Its pretty sharp at f/8 and I've seen many great photos taken with the kit lens. And can't just judge the camera from the lens it was bundled with. The beauty of SLRs, like Wai said is the ability to interchange lenses.

i have to agree with whats stated above. though myself is also new, I have seen pretty good photo from the 350D kit lens...i guess its really the perception people have that its cheap and plastic...

just sharing my thoughts though....
 

Nov 13, 2003
691
0
0
32
Sg
#17
hehe....my 2 cents----> e300
the two lens kit is :thumbsup: ...
and covers most needs.... thier other lenses though dear are
comparatively priced with C and N ...
not to mention thier current range of lenses provides many options
that are unavailable on other brands...
fisheye/7-14mm/11-22 F2.8 etc...
 

dRebelXT

New Member
May 14, 2005
1,636
0
0
#18
Nobody mentioned the ISO noise in E300 leh? You may go to Steves Digicam and
see how E300's ISO noise performance with 350D. ISO noise comes into play when
you shoot in low light or you shoot high speed objects.
 

bwilly

New Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,841
0
0
44
Woodlands
www.markkhor.com
#19
dRebelXT said:
Nobody mentioned the ISO noise in E300 leh? You may go to Steves Digicam and
see how E300's ISO noise performance with 350D. ISO noise comes into play when
you shoot in low light or you shoot high speed objects.
E300 suppose to have ISO400 only nia..
extended boast to 1600.. hence at any level
above 400, very bad noise level.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom