"..The size indicates that it can only come from the very top."
Now, wonder which one at the very top made such a major decision ??? :dunno: :bigeyes:
no need to mention... skali kena sue for nothing.
"..The size indicates that it can only come from the very top."
Now, wonder which one at the very top made such a major decision ??? :dunno: :bigeyes:
"since the officers who made the decisions were not the beneficiaries in any sense of the word,
such lapses are mistakes and are therefore acceptable..."
now, i remind my bosses with this statement every time I make bad decisions on any big projects :bsmilie::sweatsm:
"since the officers who made the decisions were not the beneficiaries in any sense of the word, such lapses are mistakes and are therefore acceptable..."
Yeah man, the officers that were guarding Selamat made honest mistakes too. So did the officers at the airport that let the man flew with his son's passport. I don't think they're the beneficiaries too. So it's all acceptable. Right! :thumbsd:
But, but, their decisions are investment related, right?
Good investment decisions, good KPIs = more bonuses for the officers.
Poor investment decisions, poor KPIs = no bonus for officers?
Really, l like the phrase "in any sense of the word"...:think:
wrong .....
it depends on WHO is the copyright's owner :bsmilie::sweatsm:
you never hear of how Batman caught the joker during the Independence Day celebration? :think:
Maybe they bought them back after the price fell lower and the news exposed
After you sell and buy back, your holdings is "unchanged since March". Ie take March's holdings, compared with Today, yup unchanged.
where do you think the funds for the investment came from? i bet part of it is from our CPF.