this is a lomo cam...it has all the defects to make a pict look old.ST1100 said:Heavy vignetting, flare, no eye contact, slanted horizon, blown sky, dirty negative, ... sorry, i don't quite get this one... pinhole camera???
holga 120S.ST1100 said:Heavy vignetting, flare, no eye contact, slanted horizon, blown sky, dirty negative, ... sorry, i don't quite get this one... pinhole camera???
which is quite easy..dont mount lens, dont load film...but that will give u a blank picture only..hehe =)Clown said:no offence, but this thread gave me an idea to toy with..
i'm gonna try to create the most technically wrong photo that i can come up with...
no worries.Clown said:no offence, but this thread gave me an idea to toy with..
i'm gonna try to create the most technically wrong photo that i can come up with...
It's very easy to take 'technically wrong' photos. It's very hard to take technically wrong photos that turn out very good.Clown said:no offence, but this thread gave me an idea to toy with..
i'm gonna try to create the most technically wrong photo that i can come up with...
if it's a Holga, it's probably not a flare spot or scanning artifect. it's more likely a light leak from the camera, which exposes part of the film.ST1100 said:And that the 'flare spot' in the picture is possibly not a flare spot but a scanning artifect, bcoz the flare spot actually extends outside the picture area in the negative.
yup, that's correct. this light leak is in every picture from the roll.Larry said:if it's a Holga, it's probably not a flare spot or scanning artifect. it's more likely a light leak from the camera, which exposes part of the film.![]()