Ehmmm....roti_prata said:read tis b4 u bbb
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/sb600vs800.htm
I agree ... even if u ignore all the other features, the superior power of the SB800 alone is enough to convince me that it's better and worth the extra moneyArtosoft said:Ehmmm....
SB800 still better leh....
Regards,
Arto.
Use a pail.TMC said:Pinch of salt......by who`s standards? Mini Me or Shaq Oneal?
Gt money buy SB800 if no money buy SB600 at lease this are the two stable flash as compare to some 3rd party funny flash ;pArtosoft said:Ehmmm....
SB800 still better leh....
Regards,
Arto.
Artosoft said:Ehmmm....
SB800 still better leh....
Regards,
Arto.
If I'm not wrong, the Sigma EF-500 DG SUPER is abt slightly more than $200 cheaper than the SB800. If u can afford that difference, go for the SB800 :thumbsup:Weird Guy said:Coz some kakis recomended sigma flash..
Which in turn the SB-600 costs the same as the Sigma EF-500.wiz23 said:If I'm not wrong, the Sigma EF-500 DG SUPER is abt slightly more than $200 cheaper than the SB800. If u can afford that difference, go for the SB800 :thumbsup:
So u mean no matter what, he should buy Nikon, right? :bsmilie:espn said:Which in turn the SB-600 costs the same as the Sigma EF-500.
i got both.donchua said:I jump to SB800 just 1 week after I bought the SB600.
Maybe it is just me only..