Got one UV filter from Nikon. This is the only one I got. All the other filters I have are from Hoya, all HMCs.
Just by looking at the reflections, the HMCs have all got much less reflection than the Nikon. What does it mean? Nikon filter got less coating, like only one coating? Nikon's brochure says that it is multi-layer coated. I might be missing something. Is there any other criteria to see that Nikon or B+W are better? Durability of the coating? Or just becos they are more Branded than Hoya?
For me, the HMC is good enough, but I wonder if the SuperHMC could even be better, more durable and only 0.3% reflection! WoW! Maybe, I should get one to see how it is, if it's not that very expensive, compared with the HMC.
I understand that hardly anyone used the Nikon filters, becos too expensive and very, very slow moving. B+W might be somewhat more popular, but I do not see the point.
Just by looking at the reflections, the HMCs have all got much less reflection than the Nikon. What does it mean? Nikon filter got less coating, like only one coating? Nikon's brochure says that it is multi-layer coated. I might be missing something. Is there any other criteria to see that Nikon or B+W are better? Durability of the coating? Or just becos they are more Branded than Hoya?
For me, the HMC is good enough, but I wonder if the SuperHMC could even be better, more durable and only 0.3% reflection! WoW! Maybe, I should get one to see how it is, if it's not that very expensive, compared with the HMC.
I understand that hardly anyone used the Nikon filters, becos too expensive and very, very slow moving. B+W might be somewhat more popular, but I do not see the point.