nikon D2Xs or D300s


yumyum

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2005
1,475
0
36
38
Singapore
www.yummibear.multiply.com
#1
Is it worth buying D2xs or upgrade to D300s ?

I like the solid body of the earlier, but i think technology wise, D300s better ? is it ?
I am using d200 now, the iso sucks when bump up on 800...ppl using this machine will know
 

lamergod

New Member
Feb 9, 2009
1,511
0
0
33
Fratton Park, Portsmouth
#2
If I'm not wrong, D2's iso capability is just a little better than d200. Have not tried the D2xs though. But I own a d200 :) really sianzzz of the ISO when I shoot night sports. I think d300s is a better choice since they have similar fps and iso capability should be heaps better. D300s's built is as good as the d200.
 

yumyum

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2005
1,475
0
36
38
Singapore
www.yummibear.multiply.com
#4
If I'm not wrong, D2's iso capability is just a little better than d200. Have not tried the D2xs though. But I own a d200 :) really sianzzz of the ISO when I shoot night sports. I think d300s is a better choice since they have similar fps and iso capability should be heaps better. D300s's built is as good as the d200.
If there's no d300s or D300, i will buy D2xs cos of the built... let's upgrade bro...
 

lamergod

New Member
Feb 9, 2009
1,511
0
0
33
Fratton Park, Portsmouth
#5
If there's no d300s or D300, i will buy D2xs cos of the built... let's upgrade bro...
I also want. But now a lot of things are in my to buy list already. First it's a tele converter then either a d90 plus d200 as a second body or remote or d700.... Sibei sian. Plus money I owe my mum for a lens this start of the year
can only suck thumb
 

yumyum

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2005
1,475
0
36
38
Singapore
www.yummibear.multiply.com
#7
I also want. But now a lot of things are in my to buy list already. First it's a tele converter then either a d90 plus d200 as a second body or remote or d700.... Sibei sian. Plus money I owe my mum for a lens this start of the year
can only suck thumb
wat lens ? 600/ f4 ??:bigeyes::bigeyes::bsmilie:
 

knpan

Senior Member
May 2, 2006
3,462
0
36
Singapore
#8
D300s definitely,

my preference, if u don like d200 tech, u buy the d2x/s will be the same, u will dump it too soon, maybe abit better only, screen is worse than d200.

Note the Normal ISO range of d2xs is max 800 only. ISO 1000 is called H0.3 :bigeyes:, H is not recommeded to use.
 

surrephoto

Senior Member
Jan 14, 2009
3,411
3
38
27
Chinatown
www.surrephoto.com
#10
Is it worth buying D2xs or upgrade to D300s ?

I like the solid body of the earlier, but i think technology wise, D300s better ? is it ?
I am using d200 now, the iso sucks when bump up on 800...ppl using this machine will know
Bro, certainly the D300s for it's ISO performance, 3D tracking. :thumbsup:

Not to forget the aibility to remove battery grip when you don't want to look obvious.
 

Treetrunk

New Member
Nov 6, 2009
1,545
0
0
#11
Definitely D300s. The obvious differences in the technical specifications should not be ignored above the physial build of the body.

Cheers:)
 

Jed

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
3,911
0
0
UK
Visit site
#12
Erm.

D2xs at ISO 125.
D300s at ISO 200.
D3/D3s at ISO 400 and above? ;p

I suppose in theory the D2xs can cover ISO 200 too ^.^
 

leowyien

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2010
860
0
16
Serangoon
#13
Neither d300s or d3xs. Go for the D300. More worth than the D300s unless you shoot videos on nikon which sux!
 

Top Bottom