Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8D ED or Sigma APO 70-200mm F 2.8 EX DG/HSM


Status
Not open for further replies.

Astin

Senior Member
Mar 2, 2002
4,736
0
36
Astin Studio
astin.clubsnap.org
#2
I dont have experience for the Sigma, but I think the Nikon is a better choice, and very good value for money if u dont need the higher priced AFS, VR, etc.
 

espn

Deregistered
Dec 20, 2002
21,905
0
0
Planet Nikon
#3
Astin said:
I dont have experience for the Sigma, but I think the Nikon is a better choice, and very good value for money if u dont need the higher priced AFS, VR, etc.
Neither, 70-200VR :thumbsup:
 

#8
TMC said:
I can get you an AFS 80-200 for 2+K if you are interested.
thanks, but will probably try and get another 500 bucks and then buy the vr model of CS, if you know anyone selling a cheap one please pm me, that would be super, but i doubt one will go any cheaper than 2500.

Thanks again
 

#10
TMC said:
ok but hope you consider a lot before you get it as it is a big sum of money.
yeah it is, its quite a hard decision, struggling with a decision at 1500 let alone 2500!!! :confused: photography's expensive! but hopefully my stock photos will help pay for some of it, just need to upload more!
 

donchua

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2004
8,167
0
0
Tampines
#11
wildstallion said:
thanks, but will probably try and get another 500 bucks and then buy the vr model of CS, if you know anyone selling a cheap one please pm me, that would be super, but i doubt one will go any cheaper than 2500.

Thanks again
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=169462

Quick!! VR70-200 start bid from $2200!!:bigeyes:
 

donchua

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2004
8,167
0
0
Tampines
#13
wildstallion said:
cheers!!!, but dont have 2200 yet!! :cry:
Then go for the AFD80-200mm..
Saw a few pieces selling around $1.1K to $1.3K in B&S..:cool:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom