Nikon 70-300 vs 70-300VR


Jul 2, 2010
117
0
16
Singapore
#1
Hi all,

I am currently using the 70-300 (non-VR) and I find the lens to produce rather soft images at focal lengths between 250mm and 300mm. Hence I'm considering to switch to the VR version of the lens, which will also help me shoot clearer photos in low light, which I often do.

I'd like to ask your experiences with using this 70-300VR and how does it compare with the non-VR in terms of sharpness. Quality is most important to me.

Thanks in advance.
 

yyD70S

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2005
2,454
0
0
Singapore
#2
I had both at some point in time; enough to assure you that despite the fact that the VR version is slightly soft somewhat between 270-300mm wide open (ie, f5.6), it produces images with better sharpness and contrast (especially) straight out-of-the-cam to warrant the $ premium over the G version.

In fact, in good light, it is a very good lens all the way up till 270mm and still very usuable thenafter. Being AFS, it naturally focuses faster (compared to the G). And being slightly heavier, it balances better with the DSLR.
 

Jul 2, 2010
117
0
16
Singapore
#3
To add on, I normally will use this lens to shoot around f/7.1 or f/8. How does this lens perform at such apertures? The non-VR is still soft at these apertures.
 

baggiolee

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,748
0
0
www.facebook.com
#4
here a rough comparison of my sold 70-300mm vr taken at 120mm and 270mm. it's quite sharp for me b4 200mm. beyond that, it's still ok for me.

both r unedited 100% crop. f4.5-5.6 roughly as i never stop down.

120mm


270mm
 

s1221ljc

Senior Member
May 7, 2006
825
1
18
#5
Hi all,

I am currently using the 70-300 (non-VR) and I find the lens to produce rather soft images at focal lengths between 250mm and 300mm. Hence I'm considering to switch to the VR version of the lens, which will also help me shoot clearer photos in low light, which I often do.

I'd like to ask your experiences with using this 70-300VR and how does it compare with the non-VR in terms of sharpness. Quality is most important to me.

Thanks in advance.
I am using the VR version of this lens. Even at 300mm I find it shockingly sharp. The VR really helped for hand held photo taking but proper technique still important & under really low light, dont expect miracles :) Never imagine can take this kind of pictures with such a long heavy lens which is nigh impossible for old manual focus lens.

The pics posted by baggiolee speak for themselves :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
 

Last edited:

chanjyj

New Member
Apr 8, 2007
1,909
0
0
#6
70-300VR is a surprisingly sharp lens. That said, your shooting technique will make alot of difference in apparent sharpness rather than the lens itself.
 

icarus

Senior Member
Jan 27, 2002
3,874
0
0
East
#7
70-300VR is a surprisingly sharp lens. That said, your shooting technique will make alot of difference in apparent sharpness rather than the lens itself.
Agreed... I sold my back breaking 70-200 VRII to get the 70-300VR... my wallet and back both thanked me. The 70-300VR is just as sharp as the 70-200VR - except that you can't use the lens indoors/low lights (i have primes which outperforms the 70-200VR for that job)
 

baggiolee

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,748
0
0
www.facebook.com
#8
Agreed... I sold my back breaking 70-200 VRII to get the 70-300VR... my wallet and back both thanked me. The 70-300VR is just as sharp as the 70-200VR - except that you can't use the lens indoors/low lights (i have primes which outperforms the 70-200VR for that job)
lol sry i strongly disagree.


70-200 f2.8 vr2 @ 160 f5 100% crop
 

Last edited:

baggiolee

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,748
0
0
www.facebook.com
#13
But to be fair, the second picture of 70-300 vr is at 270 wide open, which has no counter part for 70-200 vr2...

Maybe for 70-200 vr2, you can show sth at 200mm and f/2.8 wide open.

sry no f2.8 but 200mm f4. f2.8 shoud be around 70-80% sharpness of f4.

70-200 vr2 @ 200mm f4
 

Last edited:
Jul 2, 2010
117
0
16
Singapore
#15
Thanks for all the quick replies guys. I will be going ahead with my 70-300VR purchase. The 70-200VR looks tempting but way way beyond my budget.:)
 

baggiolee

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,748
0
0
www.facebook.com
#18
Thanks for all the quick replies guys. I will be going ahead with my 70-300VR purchase. The 70-200VR looks tempting but way way beyond my budget.:)
gd choice, it's at least alot sharper than 55-200 in my opinion. with gd lighting, its IQ will be really good.

70-300mm @ 125mm f5.6. looks really sharp if not 100% crop.
 

Last edited:

Wurdelak

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2009
2,641
0
0
westcoast
www.flickr.com
#20
you can try the tamron 70-300 vc usd and compare it with the 70-300 vr nikkor... tried it yesterday, at 300mm wide open (5.6) it's way sharp than my nikkor. price is almost the same.
 

Top Bottom