Nikon 55-200 VR Test Shots

[ThomasFoo]

Got my 55-200 VR today and did a few test shots :

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[leyo04]

3rd pix is nice. Got mine yesterday as well. It's really decent lens. congratulations..

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ThomasFoo]

 

[ahsosl1e8]

Seems like some pics were too heavily processed to judge quality of the lens :think:

I'm concerned about the focus speed. How does it compare to kit lens like 18-70?

 

[tanjonhan]

Seems like some pics were too heavily processed to judge quality of the lens :think:

I'm concerned about the focus speed. How does it compare to kit lens like 18-70?

how can you tell?

 

[lastboltnut]

How much did you buy? TIA!

 

[lastboltnut]

I would think the pics are PPed...it not, then the contrast of this lens is very good!:thumbsup:

Seems like some pics were too heavily processed to judge quality of the lens :think:

I'm concerned about the focus speed. How does it compare to kit lens like 18-70?

how can you tell?

 

[ExplorerZ]

I would think the pics are PPed...it not, then the contrast of this lens is very good!:thumbsup:

I think a little too much curve... the color doesn't looks straight out of cam. (especially the green grass)

 

[jnet6]

From the pictures, the output of the lens looks :thumbsup:
can replace travel telezoom anytime.

 

[lastboltnut]

I agree.....but the contrast is to my taste...

I think a little too much curve... the color doesn't looks straight out of cam. (especially the green grass)

 

[leyo04]

From the pictures, the output of the lens looks :thumbsup:
can replace travel telezoom anytime.

oh yeah! the VR is really a good thing. If the words "VR" "cheap" "good" are used in one sentence, we have a clear winner. :thumbsup:

 

[calebk]

Pics look like they are processed for sharpness and contrast, at the very least. Not a fair test.