thanks again... niways, here's post also
I'm using the Nikon 28-300mm with my D90.... so i guess the lens can be used on a d90.
i think i can live w/ being 10mm short on wide-angle shots if i go for the 28-300mm. besides, i'll still have my old 18-55mm kit anyways. additionally, i'm more interested on the reach as i like to take actions shots i.e. tennis, basketball, etc.
as s1221ljc says, it's about the budget too
, so on my ideal side... i'd love to get the 28-300mm if budget allows it or else i'll have to settle for the 18-200 but the downside of getting the 18-200mm would also render my 18-55mm useless already.
whilst with the 28-300mm, i can still make use of my 18-55mm on occasions where the 28-300 would be too bulky. and on a foresight, if i ever upgrade to an fx body; then i already have a lens.
anyways, i really appreciate you comments guys... thanks a lot. it really helps put things into perspective & there's always the option to rent out the lens for a day for test purposes.
here's a blog too:
Nikon 28-300mm VR vs. 18-200 VR II - Buy or Cry?
thanks again...