Need help on my pic!
- Thread starter jiewei
- Start date
- Status
isit normal if the raw photo take is not vibrant ? cos this vibrantness is i use photoshop make 1 ...
Raw as in you shot in NEF format or raw as in the jpeg out of the camera. I don't have a problem with the colour rendition of D90. I'm using 'Portrait' picture control and I usually shoot in 'Cloudy' WB. If you like things more saturated, you can use the 'Landscape' or 'Vivid' picture controls.
Work a bit on your composition.
Should have shot from a slightly different angle to bring the white park of the background away from the flower clusters. It's a bit distracting but I think might be ok if it formed the background of the stalk instead.
i edit from the NEF format 1 .
thanks for the tips i will try again later
Did you use Adobe Camera Raw/Photoshop to convert? I'm not a RAW shooter but I heard that Capture NX does a better job in converting NEF files. Actually if you don't need to do a lot of PP work, JPEF Fine should be more than sufficient and that should save you a lot of time converting from NEF.
Yup. Observe some composition rules such as Rules of Thirds, Vanishing/Leading Lines or Triangular composition to begin with and after you get the hang of it, you should be able to break away from these rules and go with what you think is pleasing.
Last edited:
noted as well... now trying shot more on rules of third composition etc... hope can produce better shots in future...
back to jiewei... good try
i oso got one of this shot .. keke
but composition still not ideal for mine.. too
wow .. how come so dark 1?
Most important is to bring the attention to the subject. Playing with contrast can help to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject. However, the bright patch on the right of the flower spoils that. It's important to watch the background also. Some people may feel that the image is slightly under but I think it's ok.
Last edited:
Oh! You shoot in Raw ah? Raw meaning uncooked, unprocess or being in its natural condition.
So naturally the color may appear somehow "uncooked".
Depending on the subject. Color for Raw file is commonly not "vibrant" compare with Process Jpeg. You go shoot the same subject again in Jpeg and compare the two and you should be able to see the difference. Flower with vibrant color usually will be quite obvious.
So naturally the color may appear somehow "uncooked".
Depending on the subject. Color for Raw file is commonly not "vibrant" compare with Process Jpeg. You go shoot the same subject again in Jpeg and compare the two and you should be able to see the difference. Flower with vibrant color usually will be quite obvious.
look's like i got alot things to learn
I'm still learning though I've been shooting for a long time already.. ;p
the dull colour is because the light is not ideal
in the picture above the light is from the back and thus the flower is in shadow, so how to get vibrant colour
try again what nice light falling on the subject and under expose slightly
in the picture above the light is from the back and thus the flower is in shadow, so how to get vibrant colour
try again what nice light falling on the subject and under expose slightly
Not totally true. It largely also depends on what processing the camera is putting each JPG image through.
TS, here is what i did with your photo.
its just one of the "millions" of ways a photo can be adjusted to make even a average photo possibly look interesting.
actually also done something to the photo, hope u dont mind... im oso on learning phrase
is it better or worse?
TS, here is what i did with your photo.
its just one of the "millions" of ways a photo can be adjusted to make even a average photo possibly look interesting.
ya it look's creative
actually also done something to the photo, hope u dont mind... im oso on learning phrase
is it better or worse?
wow that contrasting enough :thumbsup:
- Status
Similar threads
