need help choosing new lens - portraits


carocaro

New Member
Feb 17, 2009
25
0
0
#1
Hi
I'm a keen beginner with a Nikon D90 and the kit lens (18-105mm).
I now want to experiment with new lenses. I take a lot of photos of my kids and would like to get some good portraits. What would be a good lens for this and what does it offer over the kit lens? eg I never seem to get the small depth of field I would like with my existing lens, even if I fiddle with ISO and aperture/speed.
The alternative would be to go for a bigger zoom in which case which would you recommend.
Not looking for the most expensive kit around by the way! Just something that will take me to the next step. S be guided by the fact I have a D90 and not something more expensive.....
Thanks!
 

Sep 16, 2010
46
0
6
#2
take the 50mm f1.8. Cost less than $200 and you can take decent portraits shots. If you have more $$, consider 50mm f1.4D. It will give you a nice bokeh. ;)
 

Reportage

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2008
5,785
2
0
#3
just take note that 50mm is like short telephoto on crop cameras.

It is possible to get that depth of field effect with kit lens just that wont be as bokeh-licious as specialized lens. Involves more work but it is possible.
 

Last edited:

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,539
33
48
Pasir Ris
#4
eg I never seem to get the small depth of field I would like with my existing lens, even if I fiddle with ISO and aperture/speed.
Fiddling with ISO and shutter speed won't change the depth of field a single bit. Fiddling in general won't yield much results. How about reading the newbies guides about the basics? You can achieve isolating effects and you can take decent portraits with your existing lens. It's not a question of getting a new lens, it's a question of skills. Otherwise even the best lens won't help anything.
 

May 25, 2010
257
0
16
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#5
if you think that 50mm is abit "tight", can consider the 35mm f1.8G, also another decent portrait lens if you dont like to keep moving back to shoot a picture.
 

Blur Shadow

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2005
4,886
4
0
#6
There're so many... For the cheaper lenses, there's the 50mm f/1.8, AF 50mm f/1.4D, AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, AF 85mm f/1.8D, AF 60mm f/2.8D Micro, AF-S 60mm f/2.8G.

Then there's also 3rd party solutions. Sigma has 30mm and 50mm f/1.4, Tamron has a 60mm f/2...
 

Squid

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
1,467
0
0
#7
... keen beginner with a Nikon D90 and the kit lens (18-105mm).
... experiment with new lens ...take a lot of photos of my kids and would like to get some good portraits. ....
Thread starter may consider experimenting with one of these lenses
-- Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 or the more expensive Nikon 17-55 F2.8
-- Nikon 50mm F1.8 or Nikon 50mm F1.4
-- Nikon 35mm F2 or 35mm F1.8 or Sigma 30mm F1.4

If thread starter wishes to capture portraiture of children in action, than Nikon AF-S lenses would be the way to go.
 

May 25, 2010
257
0
16
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#8
Thread starter may consider experimenting with one of these lenses
-- Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 or the more expensive Nikon 17-55 F2.8
-- Nikon 50mm F1.8 or Nikon 50mm F1.4
-- Nikon 35mm F2 or 35mm F1.8 or Sigma 30mm F1.4

If thread starter wishes to capture portraiture of children in action, than Nikon AF-S lenses would be the way to go.
The price between the tamron 17-50mm f2.8 and the nikon 17-55mm f2.8 is a kind of a huge different..haha.
Since TS is shooting kids, i would recommend the nikon 35mm f1.8G, you wont have that much of a problem leaving your kid too far for you to shoot.
 

pinholecam

Moderator
Staff member
Jul 23, 2007
10,950
90
48
#9
I put up a thread roughly showing what some of the focal lengths can give for a head to shoulder photo.
Look past the brand specifics and it should serve as a guide for what DOF you get for each FL lens.

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=788852

Take note that the longer the FL, the further your working distance as well.
 

coolthought

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2008
2,310
1
0
#10
prime lens ranging from 24 to 85 f1.8 and f1.4.
Which zoom to get will depend on normally which zoom range you normally use when shooting portraits.
 

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,539
33
48
Pasir Ris
#11
I put up a thread roughly showing what some of the focal lengths can give for a head to shoulder photo.
Look past the brand specifics and it should serve as a guide for what DOF you get for each FL lens.
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=788852
Take note that the longer the FL, the further your working distance as well.
Nice guide. Would be also good to have for each picture a kind of 'making of' - just showing how close you are with the cam to subject. Guess that's what many people miss or don't have any clue about.
 

weegk

Senior Member
Jul 16, 2010
2,700
0
0
Singapore
#12
start with a 50mm f1.8 . . . cos it don't cost much . . . :)
 

kwttan

New Member
Jan 8, 2010
845
0
0
Concrete jungle
#13
Since you are using d90, my suggestion is get 35mm f/1.8G. 50mm f/1.8d may be too tight if taking indoor photos.
Price between new 35mm and 50mm are ~340 and ~190 respectively.
 

pinholecam

Moderator
Staff member
Jul 23, 2007
10,950
90
48
#14
Nice guide. Would be also good to have for each picture a kind of 'making of' - just showing how close you are with the cam to subject. Guess that's what many people miss or don't have any clue about.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Yes, I was thinking of adding the working distance information as well, but not too sure how I would be doing it (ie. in 'making of' shots or just text), though I think the former would be better.
 

narofx

New Member
Aug 12, 2006
463
0
0
#15
Hi
I'm a keen beginner with a Nikon D90 and the kit lens (18-105mm).
I now want to experiment with new lenses. I take a lot of photos of my kids and would like to get some good portraits. What would be a good lens for this and what does it offer over the kit lens? eg I never seem to get the small depth of field I would like with my existing lens, even if I fiddle with ISO and aperture/speed.
The alternative would be to go for a bigger zoom in which case which would you recommend.
Not looking for the most expensive kit around by the way! Just something that will take me to the next step. S be guided by the fact I have a D90 and not something more expensive.....
Thanks!
by portrait, do you mean from head to shoulders or from head to waist?
 

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,539
33
48
Pasir Ris
#16
Thanks for the suggestion.
Yes, I was thinking of adding the working distance information as well, but not too sure how I would be doing it (ie. in 'making of' shots or just text), though I think the former would be better.
Yes, pictures are better. Some shots from 45 degree angle left or right behind the photographer to show the photographer and the subject. Maybe a meter scale on the ground to make the distance visible. Wouldn't mind helping you :)
 

daredevil123

Moderator
Staff member
Oct 25, 2005
21,662
68
48
lil red dot
#17
The price between the tamron 17-50mm f2.8 and the nikon 17-55mm f2.8 is a kind of a huge different..haha.
Since TS is shooting kids, i would recommend the nikon 35mm f1.8G, you wont have that much of a problem leaving your kid too far for you to shoot.
For kids I recommend 35mm for FX, and 24mm for DX.

very interesting result because you can get real close, and a lot of contact with the kid.

this one shot with DX body with Sigma 24/1.8
 

pinholecam

Moderator
Staff member
Jul 23, 2007
10,950
90
48
#18
Yes, pictures are better. Some shots from 45 degree angle left or right behind the photographer to show the photographer and the subject. Maybe a meter scale on the ground to make the distance visible. Wouldn't mind helping you :)
I'll get to it over the course of the week or so.
Thanks for the offer to help. :)
Yes, totally agree that the working distance is where most ppl fail to get a grasp of.
A 200/2.8 can certainly take nice portraits, but need to stand far far away :bsmilie:
 

carocaro

New Member
Feb 17, 2009
25
0
0
#19
wow, thanks for all the quick replies, I'll look into your suggestions. Narofx maybe I used the term portrait wrongly - I mean at least head to waist, but sometimes capturing more of their body - still, emphasis on facial expression rather than the background/setting. And outdoor shots rather than indoor. Octarine, I know there is plenty more I can learn with my existing kit, but thought it would be fun to experiment with something different too. Am I wrong that changing to a fast speed decreases depth of field because of the change in aperture? I have read the basics and done a mini-course, not professing to be a gun photographer but just someone who wants to explore photography a bit more..... Thanks for the link pinholecam, that should be helpful.
Thanks again for all the advice!
 

UncleFai

Senior Member
Mar 10, 2010
4,454
39
48
Singapore
#20
Leica 50mm f/0.95 Noctilux-M - "Out-performs the human eye"... cheap cheap... USD$10,450 only... ;)

Just kidding... I too have a D90... then got the 50mm f1.8... really happy with it... so got the 50mm f1.4G also... I would highly recommend the 50mm f1.8 - as well as the 35mm DX. Best bang for the buck.
 

Top Bottom