.. for macro.
I don't think I want to spend for a K-5. So I'm down to two options: (1) get a K-r; (2) switch to Canon EOS 60D + 100mm USM Macro.
Switching to Canon will be expensive as Pentax resale prices are in the toilet and I'll have to duplicate a number of items. But the 60D is a known quantity AF-wise (pretty much same as the 50D which is quite good) and the 100mm USM Macro has a ring drive and is internal-focus, unlike the Pentax D-FA 100mm which gets seriously long as you focus close.
I don't expect the K-r to match a 60D's AF performance but how much better is it than a K20D?
I realize that a 60D + Canon macro costs >> K-5.
But.. I don't trust Pentax in the AF department anymore! I find it almost impossible to believe that a K-5 + D-FA 100mm could even approach the AF performance of the 60D + Canon macro.
I don't think I want to spend for a K-5. So I'm down to two options: (1) get a K-r; (2) switch to Canon EOS 60D + 100mm USM Macro.
Switching to Canon will be expensive as Pentax resale prices are in the toilet and I'll have to duplicate a number of items. But the 60D is a known quantity AF-wise (pretty much same as the 50D which is quite good) and the 100mm USM Macro has a ring drive and is internal-focus, unlike the Pentax D-FA 100mm which gets seriously long as you focus close.
I don't expect the K-r to match a 60D's AF performance but how much better is it than a K20D?
I realize that a 60D + Canon macro costs >> K-5.
But.. I don't trust Pentax in the AF department anymore! I find it almost impossible to believe that a K-5 + D-FA 100mm could even approach the AF performance of the 60D + Canon macro.