Model in Topless carwash is only 16


Status
Not open for further replies.

eyes

New Member
Nov 15, 2003
469
0
0
Australia
www.aljazeera.net
#1
I'm stunned. :bigeyes::bigeyes::bigeyes:



So angry that model lied she was 3 years older

IN ANOTHER shock, one model told the organiser, Mr Gerald Chen of Motoring Exchange, that she is actually 16 years old.

'Belle' had initially told both him and the freelance agent who found the models that she was 19. Neither of them had checked her IC before the event.
Both men said they were shocked by her revelation which came after one teaser of each girl had been uploaded onto the car wash's Facebook page after the event. Belle was upset because she felt she could be recognised in the photo and demanded the picture be taken down. She told The New Paper on Sunday: 'I don't think I would have a problem with just my body online. But if my face was shown, then I'm going to be in deep trouble.'

Her parents know she is modelling, but they have no idea she has posed topless and she was worried they would find out. This is her second topless shoot, though she said the first one was 'really private, not for any advertisement or anything'.

Mr Chen said he asked her, a few days after the event, to fax over a copy of her IC, to prove her age.

He said: 'If she's really 16, I also don't want to have anything to do with her.'

In the interim, he removed all four pictures of the four models from Facebook. When he got the fax, he noticed there were discrepancies in her IC details and the model release form she had filled out for the photo shoot. Belle had written the same family name, but her first name was spelt differently. She had also written a different year of birth in the model release form.

Mr Chen showed both documents to The New Paper on Sunday.

'I wasn't sure if it's really her IC, since the name was different,' he said.

But he decided not to take any chances, so he edited her out of all the pictures in the collection before uploading them. The final photo set now looks as though only three models were present. Mr Chen said that on the day of the shoot, he had asked all four girls to sign model release forms stating that they are above 18. He also asked them to bring their ICs to confirm their ages.

Belle said she didn't bring it, but she was allowed to continue with the shoot. Said Mr Chen: 'We decided to trust her, production had to go on. It's amazing, a 16-year-old looks like that.

'She sure fooled us.'

When The New Paper on Sunday met Belle in person, it was almost shocking how petite and innocent she looked in jeans, T-shirt and no make-up, compared to the vamp in the car wash photos. In an earlier phone interview, Belle admitted that she had lied about her age. But she felt it was 'not a big deal' as it was a difference of only 'a couple of years'. She claimed she had given her 'short name' instead of her full name.

The agent who got her the assignment said he was angry with her for lying, but also relieved that she was 16 and not younger.

Lawyers Nicholas Aw and Michael Loh said that in Singapore, the Children and Young Persons Act covers those below the age of 16. Anyone who turns 16 is no longer considered a juvenile. There are a number of provisions within the Act that could have been broken if Belle had been below 16. For instance, anyone who sexually exploits a child or young person - for example, procuring or attempting to procure the commission of any obscene or indecent act by any child or young person - can be fined up to $5,000, jailed up to two years, or both, for the first conviction. Her age also affects the legality of the model release form she signed. As the legal age for entering a contract in Singapore is 18, Belle's model release form - which gives the organiser all the rights to the pictures, among other things - could be void.

Said the agent: 'I think it's typical teenager mentality. She doesn't really understand the full extent of her actions.'

If the authorities investigate and find the whole car wash event to involve indecent exposure to the public, Belle can be charged in court as an adult, as she is above 16. In Singapore, it is an offence for a person to appear nude or dressed in a manner that offends public decency in a public place, or in a private place that is exposed to public view. Offenders can be fined up to $2,000, jailed up to three months, or both under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act. Any person found guilty of indecent behaviour in a public place can be fined up to $1,000 or jailed up to a month, for a first time offender.

Those in the modelling industry said that young models lying about their age to get more jobs is rare.

Checks with agencies like Looque Models, Carrie Models International and Jeffrey Chung Models showed that all of them check the models' ICs or make a copy of the document when they sign them on. All models below 18 either need parental consent, or a parent to sign the contract.


This article was first published in The New Paper.

Source: http://www.asiaone.com/News/The%2BNew%2BPaper/Story/A1Story20091026-176055.html
 

Last edited:

Ian

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2002
2,548
0
0
56
Perth Australia
#5
Far more worrying are the international legal rammifications. For example if someone from the US downloaded the teaser image then they may find themselves facing a potential child pornography charge along with all the $hit that hits the fan with such a charge, that is jail time, massive fines, loss of job, being placed on the sex offenders register to name but a few. Silly little kids like her should be publically named and blackbanned for life from modelling as there's nothing funny about what she did.

The ang moh from hell
 

gazkw

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2009
1,740
1
38
East Coast
www.garygraphy.com
#11
Just like how some organiser dun do background checks for beauty pageants
in this case here, the organiser relies on the agent for such details.

background checks for beauty pageants imply cost. i still feel it isn't really necessary - the contestants arent in it to be politicians or presidents - just a useless title that doesnt mean anything to most people around the world, they just come and go without any real impact.
 

LenzLaw

New Member
Jun 1, 2008
576
0
0
#12
in this case here, the organiser relies on the agent for such details.

background checks for beauty pageants imply cost. i still feel it isn't really necessary - the contestants arent in it to be politicians or presidents - just a useless title that doesnt mean anything to most people around the world, they just come and go without any real impact.
But then again, how long does it take to check a a contestant's IC just to make sure that she isn't underaged? A few minutes? Seconds maybe? Some basic checks should still be in place to avoid potential disputes later on.

Btw, OT a little...isnt that the model that was among those featured on XX's blog? In the most recent post in which she flamed photographers? :think:;p
 

confession

Deregistered
Jul 25, 2009
120
0
0
#13
But then again, how long does it take to check a a contestant's IC just to make sure that she isn't underaged? A few minutes? Seconds maybe? Some basic checks should still be in place to avoid potential disputes later on.

Btw, OT a little...isnt that the model that was among those featured on XX's blog? In the most recent post in which she flamed photographers? :think:;p
among XX blog, there are a few models. but if you are talking abt the cross feature, then yes she is the one. it also does not help that our infamous SBF is also milking (no pun intended) the issue of this carwash thingy quite extensively if I might add since it came out.

apparently, quite a few SBFers could automatically recognise her.
 

ahbian

Senior Member
May 23, 2006
2,467
0
0
#14
Though the model is not entirely blameless, it does seemed to me that the organiser is making a desperate attempt in trying to distance himself from all blame by acting "angry" with model for lying.

To organiser, come on, check the damn IC. Its not as if you checked and she gave you a fake IC; the fact is that you did NOT check in the first place.
 

eyes

New Member
Nov 15, 2003
469
0
0
Australia
www.aljazeera.net
#15
Actually Ian is right. Innocent people could be jailed, lose their jobs and on Interpol's paedophile list. I think she's immature of the consequences of her action. She wants the money, then she strips. After she stripped, she's worry other people may find out. So she mess the commisioner up by saying she's underage.

Somehow I kind of get her XMM mentality here that she wants the money but doesn't want the work associated with it.

If folks have been to Aussieland last few years, you'll know that even your SD card may be checked for kiddy porn. Anything that looks junior to the mates down south and you'll be in for it.

How sad our society has come to this. :(
 

Last edited:
Jun 12, 2008
757
0
0
Jalan Poonpipi
#16
How come no one organises this kinda thing in CS. :devil:

Then, I can test out the video function of my new cam.;p

I am not tiko, just wanna to test gear only la.:bsmilie:
 

#17
How come no one organises this kinda thing in CS. :devil:

Then, I can test out the video function of my new cam.;p

I am not tiko, just wanna to test gear only la.:bsmilie:
Please don't try to overstimulate your gear.

The warrenty doesn't cover that. :bsmilie:
 

#18
How come no one organises this kinda thing in CS. :devil:

Then, I can test out the video function of my new cam.;p

I am not tiko, just wanna to test gear only la.:bsmilie:
Got!

I think an Auntie Carwash Photoshoot is being organized.

A few photogenic aunties with mature allure have been interviewed. :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom