Now that I finally got the FL-36 flash, I can test out how the E-300 perform in taking macro fish photos using the Zuiko Digital ED 50mm f/2.0 Macro lens. For comparison, I also brought along my Canon 20D/Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro/550EX flash setup and took some shots as well. All were taken in RAW format.
Though I just had time to process a few of the shots, I am very impressed with this macro lens. It appeared to be a little sharper than the Sigma 105mm Macro lens and it's coating seemed to be much better as there were some shots that were very difficult to take with the Sigma lens because of internal reflections from the glass walls in some tank set-ups. The ZD lens somehow managed to take them. The FL-36 flash also worked very well in this setup and gave very good exposure even though I had used it in FP mode all the time.
Example of a macro shot taken:
Freshwater Hatchet Fish
1/250s f/11.0 at 50.0mm ISO100 with Flash
In my excitement, I had forgotten to set the ISO higher (as I usually do with the 20D) and took most of the shots at ISO 100 last night. This actually resulted in my flash having to fire at full blast for most of these shots given the settings that I had used.
I did managed to take a few at ISO 200 and I find that the E-300 performed very well with hardly any difference in noise between ISO 100 and 200 (at least in those shots I had taken). In fact, exposure seemed to be batter at ISO 200 as the flash can reach further at ISO 200 than at ISO 100.
Example of a shot taken at ISO 200:
Uaru fernandezyepezi
1/320s f/10.0 at 50.0mm iso200 with Flash
I didn't have time to processed any of the 20D shots for comparison but will post them later for those who are interested though I think not many people here are really interested in fish pics.
One very obvious difference between the 2 setups is ... the weight ! :bigeyes:
The E-300/ZD 50mm/FL-36 combo is SOOOOO MUCH lighter than the 20D/Sigma 105mm EX/550EX setup.
Though I just had time to process a few of the shots, I am very impressed with this macro lens. It appeared to be a little sharper than the Sigma 105mm Macro lens and it's coating seemed to be much better as there were some shots that were very difficult to take with the Sigma lens because of internal reflections from the glass walls in some tank set-ups. The ZD lens somehow managed to take them. The FL-36 flash also worked very well in this setup and gave very good exposure even though I had used it in FP mode all the time.
Example of a macro shot taken:
Freshwater Hatchet Fish
1/250s f/11.0 at 50.0mm ISO100 with Flash
In my excitement, I had forgotten to set the ISO higher (as I usually do with the 20D) and took most of the shots at ISO 100 last night. This actually resulted in my flash having to fire at full blast for most of these shots given the settings that I had used.
I did managed to take a few at ISO 200 and I find that the E-300 performed very well with hardly any difference in noise between ISO 100 and 200 (at least in those shots I had taken). In fact, exposure seemed to be batter at ISO 200 as the flash can reach further at ISO 200 than at ISO 100.
Example of a shot taken at ISO 200:
Uaru fernandezyepezi
1/320s f/10.0 at 50.0mm iso200 with Flash
I didn't have time to processed any of the 20D shots for comparison but will post them later for those who are interested though I think not many people here are really interested in fish pics.
One very obvious difference between the 2 setups is ... the weight ! :bigeyes:
The E-300/ZD 50mm/FL-36 combo is SOOOOO MUCH lighter than the 20D/Sigma 105mm EX/550EX setup.