Lens/Zoom


Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 11, 2008
276
0
0
Tiong Bahru
#1
To all Veterans out there,

Scenario: There's a subject that Peter would like to take a picture of. However, it is too far away. How should Peter decide what lens to buy to achieve the zoom that he need?

Appreciate your feedback.
 

Rashkae

Senior Member
Nov 28, 2005
19,105
12
0
#2
He should decide by calculating which lens will allow him to maintain a positive balance on his bank account.
 

zac08

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2005
11,755
0
0
East
#3
To all Veterans out there,

Scenario: There's a subject that Peter would like to take a picture of. However, it is too far away. How should Peter decide what lens to buy to achieve the zoom that he need?

Appreciate your feedback.
Check :

a) is it possible to get closer to the subject?

b) is it possible to use a TC to get the range required at the expense of the aperture loss.

c) buy a long lens which can allow you to reach the distance required, budget willing...

d) buy a long lens with a TC to get the range required (cheaper than a full long lens) i.e.
70-200 f2.8 with a 2x TC would be cheaper than getting a 400mm f2.8. But you lose 2 stops of light and get a 140-400 f5.6 instead... ;)
 

Jun 11, 2008
276
0
0
Tiong Bahru
#4
Rashkae: Can assume "he" is beri rich =]

zac08: Thanks for your valuable feedback. From a layman point of view, I was wondering if say a pigeon is 50m away what spec of lens can home in on it and cover about 50% of the picture. Is there a formula for this (size of object, distance away, size on picture)?
 

zac08

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2005
11,755
0
0
East
#5
Rashkae: Can assume "he" is beri rich =]

zac08: Thanks for your valuable feedback. From a layman point of view, I was wondering if say a pigeon is 50m away what spec of lens can home in on it and cover about 50% of the picture. Is there a formula for this (size of object, distance away, size on picture)?
Let's just average a pigeon at about 40cm long. To get this inside 50% of the image sensor, you'd need to know the sensor size, the focal length as well as the angle of view.

According to a calculation website I visited, 2796.8 mm would be required to get it fully in view. So Half of that would be 1350mm or so...

you got the dough for a 1000mm lens? ;)

PS : this calculation was done on a Nikon 1.5 x crop DSLR. So if you are calculating it on a different system, pls try it again here :

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-lenses.htm
 

Jun 11, 2008
276
0
0
Tiong Bahru
#6
zac08: You are a serious photographer! Thanks for spending the time explaining. Conclusion, unless you are a fifthly rich, use a high res camera to capture than digitally enlarge from there and crossfingers that you got the details :bsmilie:
 

Rashkae

Senior Member
Nov 28, 2005
19,105
12
0
#7
zac08: You are a serious photographer! Thanks for spending the time explaining. Conclusion, unless you are a fifthly rich, use a high res camera to capture than digitally enlarge from there and crossfingers that you got the details :bsmilie:
No, never digitally enlarge, you'll make it look grainy. Crop crop crop!

(yes, this is where megapixels does matter)
 

giantcanopy

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2007
6,232
2
0
SG
#8
zac08: You are a serious photographer! Thanks for spending the time explaining. Conclusion, unless you are a fifthly rich, use a high res camera to capture than digitally enlarge from there and crossfingers that you got the details :bsmilie:
There is a 1700mm prime by zeiss :bsmilie:and a 1700 - 1200 zoom by nikon

Actually there is a limit to having more MP for ur sensor. apart from noise the lens might even be outresolved.

Ryan
 

Jun 11, 2008
276
0
0
Tiong Bahru
#9
Rashkae: ahhh... "I must crop, I must crop, I must croppppp....."

giantcanopy: Thanks for insights!

Anyone tried placing camera to a telescope? maybe I am digressing :bsmilie:
 

Jun 11, 2008
276
0
0
Tiong Bahru
#11
I dun mean specialize equipment. Literally, 1 x camera and 1 x telescope. :bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom