Probably to show the amount of DI work done by the TS?
Does this means a very nice way to say the modle is .... ok, nevermind ....
now that I am no the subject ... why not ...
The first picture, well, I like the way the DI is done. I am def a sucker for smooth glowing skin. However, smooth glowing skin does not in itself makes a winning photographs. The composition, cropping off the head and the knee, the complete lost of details in the shadow to the left of the picture/model, and the faint attempt of contrast between the model and the harshness of the tree bark, does not work. Looking at the picture again, the inevitable question is what is the photographer trying to convey in the image? The model's beauty, or the dress, or what? We have absolutely no idea. I wonder if thephotographer has any?
The second picture, it's ok, but I cannot find anything to say about it.
The third picture, as much as I like soft glowing skin, this is a very good example of DI ran amuck. The face is just too soft, looked too DI'ed, looked fake. The composition of this image is really a what not to do example. The background is way too busy/cluttered with the branches and sky to one side and the the the tree bard to the opposite end.