your views pls. by the way, law society holding a discussion on the above topic tmrw at vivo city.
What's the point of discussing?
I totally agreed with this.It is important to bring awareness on what is in Women's Charter and not be ignorant of it (etc couples who are in midst of seperation under section 69 put guys to a disadvantage).
I will have prefer that etc marriage be under a "Family Charter" than a "Women's Charter". Under Women's Charter, a few sections does not seem relevant in today's society context.
I totally agreed with this.
Women's Charter was set in place in the 60/70s, where back then women were mostly still not well educated nor working, thus, the Charter was put in place to protect their interest, which was kind of relevant back then.
However, time and situation had changed, I won't say that the Women Charter is totally not relevant, but certain part surely need to review for update or even remove.
On the side note, I think it's about time to have a Men's Charter also, to protect the interest of men.
It is important to bring awareness on what is in Women's Charter and not be ignorant of it (etc couples who are in midst of seperation under section 69 put guys to a disadvantage).
I will have prefer that etc marriage be under a "Family Charter" than a "Women's Charter". Under Women's Charter, a few sections does not seem relevant in today's society context.
anyone got a link to the charter itself?
Google leads to many "sites" but I can't find the charter itself.
yes. men are always at the losing end.
No offence. but actually, I don't find it wrong to carry a woman's handbag, especially if the handbag have too many things inside and it's getting heavy for the woman.men's charter should state that men are not allowed to carry the woman's handbag
it is a sorry sight, i cringe whenever i see a man carrying a handbag
what more if it does not match his shoes