is tripod necessary for taking photos?


Status
Not open for further replies.

innovas1

New Member
Jun 6, 2003
377
0
0
SG
#1
what are yr views? Both outdoor and indoors.
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,691
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#2
To me, tripods are necessary for some situations. I use them for night shots/ long exposures mainly. Tripods are especially useful for architectural and landscape shoots when getting a straight horizon or adjusting the camera to sit parallel to the object is essential to avoid converging lines. People who uses medium and large format cameras will use them more often because you simply cannot handhold the larger cameras. I also think using the tripod slows you down considerably and force you to be careful when taking a shot, to me at least.
 

coke21

New Member
May 12, 2003
706
0
0
42
East
Visit site
#4
innovas1 said:
what are yr views? Both outdoor and indoors.
Really depends on the type of pictures you taking. Event? Landscape? Street?
Guess always good to use but the conditions might not allow you to use one.
 

innovas1

New Member
Jun 6, 2003
377
0
0
SG
#5
indoors/outdoor, low light must use, right?
 

zekai

Senior Member
May 10, 2002
1,723
1
38
Singapore
Visit site
#6
Nah you dun need tripod. maybe you need bionic limbs.
Considering you probably have bionic arm to ask this question.

If you have bionic limbs you definitely can hand hold steadily for 1/2 to 30 sec.

On a more serious note... yes you need a good tripod if shooting longer than 1/15s (my level). To compensate, shoot with a flash or a very fast lens.
 

coke21

New Member
May 12, 2003
706
0
0
42
East
Visit site
#9
innovas1 said:
indoors/outdoor, low light must use, right?

Not neccessary...like I said depends on what you shooting. If low light and taking landscape...yah definitely why not? But if you taking a performance and low light, you going to mount on tripod?
 

zekai

Senior Member
May 10, 2002
1,723
1
38
Singapore
Visit site
#11
actually i was going to ask like togu like that but in the end i decided to be more civil.
innovas is asking a lot of question that he should already be knowing...

if that is not the case i am really sorry.
 

innovas1

New Member
Jun 6, 2003
377
0
0
SG
#12
togu said:
No offence here, in the first place, do you know why are tripods needed?
i suppose is to avoid handshake/camera shake.
 

reachme2003

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2003
3,735
0
0
#13
innovas1 said:
i suppose is to avoid handshake/camera shake.
Well, you are spot on. Whether one needs a tripod or not depends on one's assessment of the circumstances under which one is taking the photos.
 

The_Cheat

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2004
2,278
0
0
Singapore
#14
Tripods are white elephants. Most people buy them thinking that it would improve their photography. Yet, lots of them end up not using these white elephants most of the time, perhaps due to the weight, the size, or the hassle to set it up.

For me, I would bring my tripod around, everytime I go out. For I wouldn't know when I would need it, either to shoot some pictures, or to whack some oncoming asssailant! :bsmilie:
 

leonzhu

New Member
May 12, 2003
212
0
0
33
Singapore
thegeekphoto.com
#15
Tripods are listed as one of the "must have" accessories for a serious photographer. If you want to buy one, buy the best you can afford.

The catch is, you don't have to use one all the time! Most of the time, your shots will be handheld. If you do sports or events, you wouls most likely favor a monopod.

Landscape, archi and similar genres of photography do require a tripod, 99% of the time.

But what effect you want depends on you. And you alone. I refer to a valentine's day post where someone used camera shake to draw hearts with the city lights. That was cool.

So, it's not necessary, but it depends on your needs.

That said, i think a monopod is handier for fighting off assailants and dogs. Pity my monopod got lost in Thailand on a recent assignment. Shucks.
 

The_Cheat

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2004
2,278
0
0
Singapore
#16
leonzhu said:
Tripods are listed as one of the "must have" accessories for a serious photographer. If you want to buy one, buy the best you can afford.

The catch is, you don't have to use one all the time! Most of the time, your shots will be handheld. If you do sports or events, you wouls most likely favor a monopod.

Landscape, archi and similar genres of photography do require a tripod, 99% of the time.

But what effect you want depends on you. And you alone. I refer to a valentine's day post where someone used camera shake to draw hearts with the city lights. That was cool.

So, it's not necessary, but it depends on your needs.

That said, i think a monopod is handier for fighting off assailants and dogs. Pity my monopod got lost in Thailand on a recent assignment. Shucks.
But monopod only one leg, while tripod three legs mah! Three is more powerful than one in fighting assailants off right? :bsmilie:

Just joking... :bsmilie:
 

zaren

Moderator
Staff member
Oct 27, 2003
10,956
26
48
#17
bot a tripod but hardly use it since i now shoot mainly street and want to keep gear to a minimum. by the time u set up the tripod, the decisive moment is gone... might try out a monopod sometime in the future though ...
 

togu

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2002
5,290
0
0
44
@ D08
www.tommygui.com
#18
zekai said:
actually i was going to ask like togu like that but in the end i decided to be more civil.
innovas is asking a lot of question that he should already be knowing...

if that is not the case i am really sorry.


:kok: :kok: :kok:


Say me not civil.... grrrrr
 

zekai

Senior Member
May 10, 2002
1,723
1
38
Singapore
Visit site
#20
togu said:
:kok: :kok: :kok:


Say me not civil.... grrrrr

er... i meant you are more forth coming, direct and HONEST with your opinion.
we really need more people like togu around :bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom