i realize most always do PP..... y is tat so??? and wa kind of PP usually needed???
i still a newbie btw.... tis question come to mind cas.... last time during film era... no PP was done.. and good photo still appeared..... so it was like... now pple using PP to beautify/corrected the photo they took... it like.. erm cheating??? jus my tot... is digital sensor cant produce anything near film standard?
i still a newbie btw.... tis question come to mind cas.... last time during film era... no PP was done.. and good photo still appeared..... so it was like... now pple using PP to beautify/corrected the photo they took... it like.. erm cheating??? jus my tot... is digital sensor cant produce anything near film standard?
During exposure, values in the image can be adjusted, most often by "dodging" (reducing the amount of light to a specific area of an image by selectively blocking light to it for part or all of the exposure time) and/or "burning" (giving additional exposure to specific area of an image by exposing only it while blocking light to the rest). Filters, usually thin pieces of colored plastic, can be used to increase or decrease an image's contrast (the difference between dark tones and light tones). After exposure, the photographic printing paper (which still appears blank) is ready to be processed. [4]
For high quality prints it is common to hand retouch the print to make the spot blend in, like the digital clone tool.
The technique of arranging negatives in layers in the enlarger to print a combined image is another simple darkroom trick. One common use is to combine a stock shot of the moon with another shot to give an instant moonlight scene. The negatives are stacked in layers, hence the name of the technique and this carries over to the digital technique of combining images.
i still a newbie btw.... tis question come to mind cas.... last time during film era... no PP was done.. and good photo still appeared..... so it was like... now pple using PP to beautify/corrected the photo they took... it like.. erm cheating??? jus my tot... is digital sensor cant produce anything near film standard?
i still a newbie btw.... tis question come to mind cas.... last time during film era... no PP was done.. and good photo still appeared..... so it was like... now pple using PP to beautify/corrected the photo they took... it like.. erm cheating??? jus my tot... is digital sensor cant produce anything near film standard?
so simply put... no good photographer will shown their pic 'raw'????
i always tot PP is akin to 'cheating'.... but i think slight PP-ing is need most of the time ba...... tis is really not a cheap hobby...This topic has been discussed several years already ...
But there is always 2 schools. See which one you like to join.
damn... really must learn abit of PP liao...... hoho......
you need to read more about the darkroom..
film no pp? hahahaha.