Is LCD any good for photo editing?
Me thinking of upgrading as my CRT is going to spoil already...
Thanks...
Me thinking of upgrading as my CRT is going to spoil already...
Thanks...
Flame indeed!AJ23 said:haha, this's a potential thread to topple the Thread Champion?
Without going too much into technicalities and/or ergonimics or whatsoever, my personal take is CRT monitors. My simple reasons (in general),
(1) size for size, CRT is cheaper
(2) colour accuracy
(3) better saturation, hue, contrast
(4) faster response, higher refresh frequency
(5) I :heart: old technology
That's my opinion.
And let the war BEGINS. :blah:
AJ23 said:haha, this's a potential thread to topple the Thread Champion?
Without going too much into technicalities and/or ergonimics or whatsoever, my personal take is CRT monitors. My simple reasons (in general),
(1) size for size, CRT is cheaper
(2) colour accuracy
(3) better saturation, hue, contrast
(4) faster response, higher refresh frequency
(5) I :heart: old technology
That's my opinion.
And let the war BEGINS. :blah:
erwinx said:I am looking forward to getting an LCD monitor for my photoediting computer because of the space saving. Fortunately, LCD monitors are improving all the time, so I hope it'll be soon.
AJ23 said:haha, this's a potential thread to topple the Thread Champion?
AJ23 said:Without going too much into technicalities and/or ergonimics or whatsoever, my personal take is CRT monitors. My simple reasons (in general),
(1) size for size, CRT is cheaper
(2) colour accuracy
(3) better saturation, hue, contrast
(4) faster response, higher refresh frequency
(5) I :heart: old technology
That's my opinion.
And let the war BEGINS. :blah:
AJ23 said:(5) I :heart: old technology
scanner said::bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
So is D2H an old camera model?
:blah:
AJ23 said:(4) faster response, higher refresh frequency
That's my opinion.
And let the war BEGINS. :blah:
Yes it does.ledmirage said:tho LCD dun have such thing "refresh frequency" ? :think:
AJ23 said:haha, this's a potential thread to topple the Thread Champion?
Without going too much into technicalities and/or ergonimics or whatsoever, my personal take is CRT monitors. My simple reasons (in general),
(1) size for size, CRT is cheaper
(2) colour accuracy
(3) better saturation, hue, contrast
(4) faster response, higher refresh frequency
(5) I :heart: old technology
That's my opinion.
And let the war BEGINS. :blah:
Royce said:Yes it does.
LCD refresh frequency is lower than CRT, but that doesn't mean CRT is better because of it. Different hardware = different rates. Flicker free CRT rate will be higher than equivalent on LCD.
Well mine doesn't flicker one bit, so guess it must be a myth!TME said:So is it a myth that LCDs do not flicker? I mean those which are connected via DVI cables from gfx card to LCD panel? I thought LCDs dun have refresh rates technically - meaning the vertical sync rate of a CRT.... or do they refresh in another sense? Thanks!