Quite right though not entirely in the terminology. Match is pretty much the naive way of looking at colour management. If you happen to have a copy of photoshop, try the soft profiling on a CMYK profile. It doesn't match. It basically squeeze or cut your source gamut to within what can be achieved by your target device via various possible algorithms. Each result in slightly different output depending on the source image type. Some algorithm preserve the colours while clipping to the output while some proportionally squeeze the whole colour gamut to fit into the smaller one, which are good for tones images such as photographs.Ultimately while working in a simulated target profile, the display will not show colours that are not achievable by the target device. Even if you choose a 100% red, the colour shown is not the same. It will be something similar not orangey as oppose to without colour management.
That being said, in current times, there is no longer much advantage of Mac over PC, because colour management is quite mature on Windows over the years. Even Linux windows manager environments such as KDE and Gnome are picking it up, using littlecms library for some softwares.Colour management aside, I see TS can get a probably cheaper but not that much cheaper alternatives with PC counterparts. Apple has been very aggressive with the pricing and if you look at what you get for the price, I say it's a good buy.
Earlier bsod is actually a windows os running on Mac hardware. Mac has it's own death screen which is a slow scrolling down effect of screen darkening which I have occurred multiple times.If TS wants to jump ship into Mac, it's a good choice in my opinion. Having uses several good or bad or enterprising operating system, I have experienced and witness the pro and cons of it's choice. I was once a die hard supporter for PC when Mac was just Mac OS 9. But times have changed since Mac adopted a unix platform based on bsd known as Darwin. With both beauty And stability fuse into the same product, I see no reason for one to not get attracted by it.
I also run parallels desktop in Mac to run my office and project and visio. I know Mac has office equiv but seriously it lack the impact in usage workflow that windows has to offer. After all it's a ms product, why should they make the Mac version better. Mac has pages? Think twice when people you are dealing with are windows corporate project managers and they are not interested with your page document when they use office 97. Open office is a piece of crap IMHO.
If you are on Mac, you have to start looking at a deeper pocket for you wouldn't find piracy for Mac as wild as PC. Not that there isn't, but I think the PC community in this area truly excel due to legacy. Lolx. Oh I love piracy btw.