yes i do. i believe only those that i writeOriginally posted by Ian
Which of the following best describes your view of equipment reviews.
Do you have any views on gear reviews and reviewers in general?
They are afraid to say "I bought this coz I read someone's excellent review".Originally posted by YSLee
Yea, with the number of Zeiss and Leitz die-hards around, the poll results look surprisingly skewed so far.
Ever realize Computer Times always gives glowing reviews?Originally posted by erwinx
Streetshooter's point that user reviews are more valuable than magazine reviews is a valid one, the difficulty is finding 'genuine' user reviews.
As for Phil's site, I think their conclusions are pretty straightforward, and they're kept 'honest' by competing sites. An example was how Phil and Steve (steve's digicams) came to a similar negative conclusion about the Panasonic Lumix. [compare with the glowing review in our very own Computer Times]
not really ;p many times I read about reviewers complaining that pics taken in bright day light appears darker than the actual conditions.Originally posted by ckiang
Ever realize Computer Times always gives glowing reviews?
REGURGITOPIA:Originally posted by Radeon
heh computer times sucks...the only thing i actually see in there are the adverts...and some more the reviews are quite similar to ones a read around
Their source will be ClubSnapOriginally posted by ninelives
So, their source will be review site.