Images Samples from Lens for KM (Casual Shoots Welcome)


Drudkh said:
the bokeh from the 500 f/8 reminds me of Kellogs Fruitloops! lol! :bsmilie:
didn't knew you have this lens!

I just received it few days ago... friend ask me to sell it, well, I guess, I am going to buy it..

Nice lens to use...

It is very light and the reach is amazing...

Hart
 

More testing on 200mm f2.8 APO G

Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G + KM 2x APO TC @ f5.6 ISO 200
50694369.jpg


Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G + Tamron SP 2x TC @f 5.6 ISO 200
50694368.jpg


Minolta 200 f2.8 APO G + Tamron SP2x TC @ f8 ISO 200
50694370.jpg


Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G + KM 2x APO TC + Tamron SP 2x TC @ f11 ISO800
50694367.jpg


I am impressed with the quality of the lens even with 2 stack of TC.... I find the image quality is almost identical for Tamron SP 2x TC and KM 2x APO TC

Any opinion?

Hart
 

I can see more details with the Minolta TC than with the Tamron.
 

Drudkh said:
I can see more details with the Minolta TC than with the Tamron.

I agree...

However in Aust, KM 2x TC APO is A$1050 and Tamron SP 2x TC is $350.

Hart
 

More lenses tested...

Minolta 35-70 f4 Macro (older type)

f4
50696283.jpg


f4 100%crop
50696284.jpg


f8
50696285.jpg


f8 100% crop
50696286.jpg


Very sharp indeed... even at f4, its not too bad.

Hart
 

Agetan said:
More lenses tested...

Minolta 35-70 f4 Macro (older type)

f4 100%crop
50696284.jpg

Very sharp indeed... even at f4, its not too bad.

Hart

Very good! too bad the focal lenght is not too convenient to use.
 

Tamron SP AF DI 90mm f/2.8 Macro

44220326.jpg


Focal Length: 90 mm
Exposure Time: 1/250 sec
Aperture: f/2.8
ISO Equivalent: 100




44220330.jpg


Focal Length: 90 mm
Exposure Time: 1/30 sec
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO Equivalent: 400




44221192.jpg


Focal Length: 90 mm
Exposure Time: 1/250 sec
Aperture: f/4
ISO Equivalent: 1600




44221193.jpg


Focal Length: 90 mm
Exposure Time: 1/20 sec
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO Equivalent: 400


All pictures are resized and cropped, not processing was done.
 

Shots look under exposed... I thought this thread is for Minolta lens? Hehe... Maybe can have another thread on the other 3rd party lens...
 

grado said:
Shots look under exposed... I thought this thread is for Minolta lens? Hehe... Maybe can have another thread on the other 3rd party lens...


err.. I read sulhan's first thread 3rd party can be posted. So I did. The shots are bit darky but definitely not under exposed. I can still see many details in the shadow area on my LCD.
 

Opps, Tokrot, my mistake about not being able to post 3rd party lens samples. But I still think the pics look under exposed, perhaps on my monitor. Btw, can minolta film users posts pics too? The pics would be scanned so I think no point having 100% crops.
 

Very sharp indeed...

Any post processing?

Hart
 

Tricky shots you got there... The shots by the 17-35(D) seems to be off-focus though? First one seems to be focussed on the background, 2nd seems to be hand-shake and 3rd the depth of field seems not deep enough... The 50mm f1.4 shots seems nice and sharp.
 

Hiee..Pals...

Now for a couple of Triathlon Shots...from yesterday..

i) taken with th 80-200 APO G
kh_01.jpg


ii) Taken with the 400 APO G
jt_01.jpg


rgds,
sulhan
 

Nice action shots and colours, these I like!
 

Hiee...

Just some sample shots taken with the KM 100mm f2.8 macro.

spikey.jpg


spikey2.jpg


Purposely chose things with hair to see how the lens resolve hairs!!!:bsmilie: :bsmilie:

And of course resolve compound eyes..

compound.jpg



rgds,
sulhan
 

Got my D5D today, went to esplanade to try the cam ;p

Untitled-1edited.jpg


Untitled-1copy.jpg