I have searched the forums but could not find the above.
For convinence, I usually use the "rotate" function on Win XP to bring my JPG images to vertical. My friend told me that this inevitably reduces the size of the JPG images on disk after rotation. It is correct to assume now the rotated JPG images is of lessor quality? after losing more details, useless or otherwise?
By this asumption, doing rotation on Adobe or other high-end software retains all the original JPG quality (if any). I am trying very hard to stay away from RAW for all non-paid images.
Anyone can point me to where I can get more information? Or just pen us some of the infor you already know.
Opinions also can.
For convinence, I usually use the "rotate" function on Win XP to bring my JPG images to vertical. My friend told me that this inevitably reduces the size of the JPG images on disk after rotation. It is correct to assume now the rotated JPG images is of lessor quality? after losing more details, useless or otherwise?
By this asumption, doing rotation on Adobe or other high-end software retains all the original JPG quality (if any). I am trying very hard to stay away from RAW for all non-paid images.
Anyone can point me to where I can get more information? Or just pen us some of the infor you already know.
Opinions also can.