Yes. No joke. It is very useful for insect macro photography.Paul_Yeo said:just curious. ha ha
megaweb said:Yes. No joke. It is very useful for insect macro photography.
davsmiths said:i will. 100% coverage.
tilt and turn e best. can shoot insects under the leaf. shoot above people's head. and all other angles i have yet to thought of. to shoot around the corner w/o people noticing u? not with a 300mm lah...
Still difficult lar, not much diff. At very long focal lengths, its very tough to track a tiny bird. A zoom lens would work better.CYRN said:Yes!!!... in situation where you dun wan your eyes stuck to the viewfinder.
for me is panning a fast and small bird at long focal length
espn said:Siao...
1) The sensor needs to be continously powered (ie: shorter sensor life, battery life)
2) Dust is even more easy to rest on sensor (ie: No shutter no mirror to protect sensor)
3) The sensor need to 'freeze' the motion & AF when half-press (ie: like DCs, thus slower AF, slower tracking)
WTH would anybody want to use LCD on a SLR. Defeats the purpose.
Change name to Interchangable Lense Camera(ILC). :bsmilie:espn said:Siao...
1) The sensor needs to be continously powered (ie: shorter sensor life, battery life)
2) Dust is even more easy to rest on sensor (ie: No shutter no mirror to protect sensor)
3) The sensor need to 'freeze' the motion & AF when half-press (ie: like DCs, thus slower AF, slower tracking)
WTH would anybody want to use LCD on a SLR. Defeats the purpose.
espn said:Siao...
1) The sensor needs to be continously powered (ie: shorter sensor life, battery life)
2) Dust is even more easy to rest on sensor (ie: No shutter no mirror to protect sensor)
3) The sensor need to 'freeze' the motion & AF when half-press (ie: like DCs, thus slower AF, slower tracking)
WTH would anybody want to use LCD on a SLR. Defeats the purpose.
Hommie said:Change name to Interchangable Lense Camera(ILC). :bsmilie:
Its good for overhead shots like a videocam. :thumbsup:
espn said:Siao...
1) The sensor needs to be continously powered (ie: shorter sensor life, battery life)
2) Dust is even more easy to rest on sensor (ie: No shutter no mirror to protect sensor)
3) The sensor need to 'freeze' the motion & AF when half-press (ie: like DCs, thus slower AF, slower tracking)
WTH would anybody want to use LCD on a SLR. Defeats the purpose.
And also the EOS 1 Rs ( :dunno: ) something called pellicle mirror?Firefox said:Yea..
There's no way a DSLR would not have a mirror. Otherwise, it'd not be called a LR camera. Lens Reflex refers to the motion of the mirror when you're taking a shot.
AFAIK, there are only 2 digital camera's with an optical TTL viewfinder that do not have a mirror. They're the Olympus E-10 and E-20 which use a pentaprism to split the image to the viewfinder..
CYRN said:For 1... the LCD preview only comes active when shutter is halfpressed... this should not shorten the sensor and battery lifespan too much.
For 2... I quote
And also the EOS 1 Rs ( :dunno: ) something called pellicle mirror?
For 3... Dun get you... on slr, the focusing unit is seperate and independent from the sensor anyway How can affect focusing and AF speed?