I think these count as portraits...?

[paxluv]

San Diego, California, USA...

okay, so now my other one won't work.. great. I hate this.

 

[topster]

sure they count as portraits..........more like thumbnail portraits. Now where did I put that magnifying glass

 

[paxluv]

sure they count as portraits..........more like thumbnail portraits. Now where did I put that magnifying glass

wait are you serious??? They are positively GINORMOUS on my computer screen... Am I going crazy?? :embrass:

 

[topster]

I havent tried photobucket. Could it be that you pasted the thumbnail link instead of the real link?

 

[paxluv]

No, that's the real link... and they still look larger than life to me... ??

 

[Slivester]

58 x 92 and 74 x 49 are larger than life? :think:

 

[paxluv]

okay, don't believe me... but on my screen, they're 921 x 1467 and 1185x 788


If I go on my other lap top, it doesn't even show the "Portraits and Poses" thread!

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE!??!?!?

 

[knoxknocks]

okay, don't believe me... but on my screen, they're 921 x 1467 and 1185x 788


If I go on my other lap top, it doesn't even show the "Portraits and Poses" thread!

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE!??!?!?

dude photobucket automatically downsizes your image if they're too big. try something like 700pixels on the widest side, 72dpi and save as JPG quality 10 and re-upload to PB. that should work

 

[eikin]

keep the images within 250kb as well

 

[paxluv]

dude photobucket automatically downsizes your image if they're too big. try something like 700pixels on the widest side, 72dpi and save as JPG quality 10 and re-upload to PB. that should work

dude.... that still doesn't explain it's grande size on my screen and teeny tiny size on yours.

p.s. English would help. What the hose is 72dpi?

 

[paxluv]

I SEE THEIR TINY-NESS!!! OH MY GOODNESS!!! THEY REALLY ARE SMALL!!!


Wow... now I feel like I'm a psycho....?


Okay.... trying again.

 

[DT_]

:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie: interesting...

 

[lemontree]

haha! nice try!