I need your opinions! Contax vs Canon


Status
Not open for further replies.

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#1
Hey guys, I need your opinions to help me decide on whether to switch from Canon to Contax. Currently owning an EOS 3 , thinking of switching to Contax N1 for the sharpness and colour of the Carl Zeiss lenses.

However, I was told Contax N1 auto-focusing is slow and not so accurate.

And I have a hard time comparing these 2 brands.

Well, in any case, I need the SLR for commercial photography like food shoots, wedding photography, glamour photography and events/concerts coverage. Hope this helps you to give me some comments. Thanks!
 

Top Gun

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
546
0
0
40
Visit site
#2
Hi, my friend,
Have you considered whether you can afford a DSLR from contax?
:cool:
 

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#3
Current
-------
EOS 3 w/PB-E2
EF 17-35mm f2.8L USM
Tokina ATX Pro II 28-80mm f2.8
EF 70-200mm f2.8L USM
550EX
RS-80N3
Kenko 2X TC MC7 (x2)

Thinking of
----------
Contax N1 w/P9
Carl Zeiss N Vario Sonnar T* 24-85mm f3.5-4.5
Carl Zeiss N Vario Sonnar T* 70-300mm f4-5.6
Carl Zeiss N Planar T* 50mm f1.4
 

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#4
Top Gun said:
Hi, my friend,
Have you considered whether you can afford a DSLR from contax?
:cool:
Yup I have considered and I believe if I change over, I will get it someday in future. But if I change I'll still keep D30 and a lens.

More advice please! Thanks!
 

Parchiao

Deregistered
Jan 2, 2003
1,829
0
0
Visit site
#5
Chyeo, I don't see why you should migrate from your L lenses to CZ T* lenses. If you need the autotofocus speed, stay with Canon and your L lenses as there is non better, period.

But if you are into portraiture, landscape photography and other types of photography where focusing speed is not important but optical quality is, save your money and try out the manual focus stuff. For the price of a N1+24-85, you could easily get a AX/RX/ST + 28/2.8 + 50/1.4 + 85/1.4 set, easily some of the best lenses that money can buy. Only downside is that you don't get mirror lockup, cause it only comes in the RTS/S2. Forget about the zoom lenses as you will get better results with FFL lenses. Of course, this is just my opinion.
 

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#6
Parchiao said:
Chyeo, I don't see why you should migrate from your L lenses to CZ T* lenses. If you need the autotofocus speed, stay with Canon and your L lenses as there is non better, period.

But if you are into portraiture, landscape photography and other types of photography where focusing speed is not important but optical quality is, save your money and try out the manual focus stuff. For the price of a N1+24-85, you could easily get a AX/RX/ST + 28/2.8 + 50/1.4 + 85/1.4 set, easily some of the best lenses that money can buy. Only downside is that you don't get mirror lockup, cause it only comes in the RTS/S2. Forget about the zoom lenses as you will get better results with FFL lenses. Of course, this is just my opinion.
Hmm. Can sleep over your words tonight. Thanks.
 

kex

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2002
2,078
0
36
beebox
www.beebox.com.sg
#10
IMO,if u are producing mostly prints,you won't see any diff between canon lens and carl zeiss becos most printing are done digitally now.
Unless u are shooting slides where printing is not needed,u should stick with canon.
i would put the $$ in Medium format if i were you :)
 

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#11
kex said:
IMO,if u are producing mostly prints,you won't see any diff between canon lens and carl zeiss becos most printing are done digitally now.
Unless u are shooting slides where printing is not needed,u should stick with canon.
i would put the $$ in Medium format if i were you :)
No I am still using conventional prints from a conventional machine, so I can see the difference well. I hate digital prints anyway.

Yes I shoot slides too.

And yes, I am already shooting medium format.
 

A

andylee

Guest
#12
kex said:
IMO,if u are producing mostly prints,you won't see any diff between canon lens and carl zeiss becos most printing are done digitally now.
Unless u are shooting slides where printing is not needed,u should stick with canon.
i would put the $$ in Medium format if i were you :)
I second that...the lens for contax is limited also. go get yourself a mamiya 7 better.for other peoples' work use canon,for your own work use mamiya 7.
 

chyeo

Senior Member
May 6, 2002
1,701
0
0
37
Woodlands
#13
Hmm looks like no one supports the idea of switching to Contax N system (perhaps too many Canon users here? :D ) Think I will stay on in Canon lah. But in future I will definitely get a manual Contax to ease my desire for Carl Zeiss lenses. Hehe... Thanks to all for the kind advice! :thumbsup:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom